[comp.dcom.telecom] Intra-lata credit calls

SPGDCM@CMSA.BERKELEY.EDU.UUCP (06/11/87)

 MSG:FROM: SPGDCM  --UCBCMSA  TO: NETWORK --NETWORK           06/11/87 13:52:27
 To: NETWORK --NETWORK  Network Address

 From:    Doug Mosher                 <SPGDCM at UCBCMSA>
 Title:   MVS/Tandem Systems Manager  (415)642-5823
 Office:  Evans 257, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
 Subject: Intra-lata credit calls

 To: telecom@buit1.bu.edu

 The discontinuance of promotion of ATT long-distance credit cards by Regional
 companies still leaves unresolved how anyone is supposed to handle intra-lata
 long-distance calls. People still make them and need to charge them.

 For that matter, I have been sustainedly confused on the nature of intra-lata
 calls. Originally (the dawn of time for tel reorg, a few years ago) the
 competing ld carriers such as Sprint stated in their literature that their
 services were, I believe, "only for interstate calls". This has been changed,
 I believe, to "only for inter-lata calls". It always seemed to me that the
 equipment itself did not screen out intra-lata calls and if you wanted to do
 it you went ahead and did it and paid the ld carrier for it, the silliest
 example being right in the same local place (but possibly still useful for
 payphone calls if you haven't a dime).

 That seemed to create a legal lacuna that nobody did anything about or worried
 about.

 Do any readers have comments on this blurry legal state, and on what regional
 companies might possibly do to charge, and account for, intra-lata credit
 calls?

 Thanks, Doug
   e  Intra-lata credit calls

rees.UUCP@apollo.UUCP (06/17/87)

I've noticed that when I make an intra-lata call in Michigan (formerly
Michigan Bell), and charge it on my calling card, the charge shows up
on the NE Tel portion of my bill (my home service is from NE Tel), but
it not listed as anything special.  I assume that NE Tel is doing the
billing on behalf of Michigan Bell, but it doesn't say that on the bill.

But why should my AT&T card number allow Michigan Bell to bill NE Tel?
AT&T wasn't involved in the call.  Or is the card acting as a NE Tel
card at the time?  If so, why should Michigan Bell honor the card?
I think the technology has outpaced the regulation, as usual, but it's
nice that these calls still work.