[comp.dcom.telecom] FCC news release on PDN surcharge

ROODE@BIONET-20.ARPA (David Roode) (06/25/87)

Following is the FCC access charges news release of June 10, 1987.  (This is
not
the official text of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).)
 
FCC PROPOSES ELIMINATION OF INTERSTATE ACCESS CHARGES EXEMPTION FOR ENHANCED
SERVICE PROVIDERS
 
   The Commission has proposed elimination of the exemption from interstate
access charges currently allowed enhanced service providers, effective
January 1, 1988.  Charges for intrastate service would not be affected.
   Enhanced services add value to, or enhance the use of, basic transmission
service.  Examples of enhanced services, which the Commission defined in its
Computer II and Computer III procedings, include computer-based applications
such as protocol processing, information retrieval systems and voice or
message services.
   In its access charge proceeding, the Commission provided for exemptions
for a number of groups.  These exemptions have gradually been eliminated.
   In the pre-access environment, enhanced service providers and WATS
resellers were paying local business exchange service rates for their
interstate access, rather than the higher charges that other common carriers
(OCCs) were paying and the even higher amounts assessed to MTS and WATS
through the divisions of revenues and settlements processes.  The Commission
decided that the immediate imposition of interstate access charges on enhanced
service providers and resellers could affect their ability to provide service
during the time they were adjusting to the new access charge rules.
Consequently, the Commission granted enhanced service providers, as well as
resellers, a temporary exemption from payment of interstate access charges.
   In proposing to eliminate this exemption, the Commission said it was
concerned that the charges currently paid by enhanced service providers did
not contribute sufficiently to the cost of the exchange access facilities
they use in offering services to the public.  Concerns about rate shock
might justify a temporary, but not a permanent, exemption from access
charges.  Enhanced service providers have had ample notice of the Commission's
ultimate intent to apply interstate access charges and ample opportunity to
adjust their planning accordingly.
   Moreover, it said, the potential financial impact on enhanced service
providers of eliminating their exemption is substantially smaller than it
was at the time the exemption was granted.  In particular, the Commission
noted that the common carrier line charge has decreased dramatically with the
introduction of subscriber line charges.
END
-------