[comp.dcom.telecom] Calling Party ID: the economics

@ll-vlsi.ARPA:black@ll-micro (Jerry Glomph Black) (03/20/89)

In the midst of all the interesting and spirited debating of the last week on
this subject, I think one issue has been slighted: the potential imbalance of
those subscribers getting this service.  I think the charge is on the order of
7 bucks/month, plus an $80 box which sits next to one phone in your house.
This would more than double the basic monthly rate for residential customers in
my state,  and I really think few would sign up for the CLASS service.  So you
have a situation where the majority of home users are *forced* to dial in the
'anonymity code' every time they wish to call a business or other place that
shouldn't get their number so easily.  I hope they have 'anonymity default'
settings for 'the rest of us' who will not be buying the service.

The local companies overcharge for all these 'value added' services: recently
they really made me guffaw when the local company itself telemarketed these
useless services, especially "speed-calling", where they want $4.12 per month
to do what any $20 cheapo phone can do: store 10 numbers.  They also charge 58
cents/month for touch-tone (but in most exchanges in this area, TT phones work
even for those who don't pay: not worth the bother of policing, I guess).

Jerry G Black, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, 244 Wood St. C-120, Lexington MA 02173
Phone (617) 981-4721     Fax (617) 862-9057  black@micro@VLSI.LL.MIT.EDU