cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) (05/11/89)
1. Are codes like 10222 and 10288 supposed to work from residence and business phones as well as pay ones? 2. I just passed through the Lynchburg, Va. area, and used a pay phone (ostensibly C&P) to place a 0+ call inter-LATA, and it went via ITI. (I guess that means: ugh.)
rdr@killer.dallas.tx.us (Dean Riddlebarger) (05/16/89)
In article <telecom-v09i0162m06@vector.dallas.tx.us>, cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) writes: > 1. Are codes like 10222 and 10288 supposed to work from residence and > business phones as well as pay ones? > > 2. I just passed through the Lynchburg, Va. area, and used a pay phone > (ostensibly C&P) to place a 0+ call inter-LATA, and it went via ITI. > (I guess that means: ugh.) At a relative's home in Indianapolis 10288 works just fine [yep, I'm trying to make a conversion....:-) :-)]. I would assume that nearly all BOC locations can handle this now from residential locations, but some of the smaller independents may still be a bit behind the times. Dean Riddlebarger Systems Consultant - AT&T [216] 348-6863 reasonable path: att!crfax!crnsnwbt!rdr