[comp.dcom.telecom] The Verification Operator is NOT Inward

covert@covert.enet.dec.com (John R. Covert) (08/05/89)

>A couple (?) of Digests back, John Covert mentioned that AT&T
>operators can not talk to Local Bell operators via inward dialing.
>
>I'm not sure if I'm right, and maybe in New England it's different,
>but if that's the case, how do AT&T ops do Emergency Interrupts and
>Busy Verifications?

In V9#250, I wrote

>In no case will an AT&T operator calling Inward reach a local Baby Bell
>operator.  Only in the case of the completing calls to non-diallable points
>(and there are thousands of them left, especially in California), will an
>AT&T operator end up on a Baby Bell toll board, but this isn't Inward.

I should have included verification as a case where AT&T operators can end
up on a Baby Bell board.  But again, this is NOT "Inward" and Baby Bell
verification operators are prohibited from completing calls for AT&T if the
number turns out to be available.  The AT&T operator will have to redial the
call from the originating point or possibly via AT&T Inward.

There is a good reason for this, and it has to do with DOLLARS.  Unless the
AT&T call is completed via AT&T's FGD trunks, the local operating company does
not get its share of the revenue from the call.

/john