CER2520@ritvax.bitnet (C. E. Reid) (08/31/89)
Greetings, Fellow Telecom Readers!
I can't pass this one off! So here goes:
[ Reprinted without permission from INFORMATION WEEK, August 28, 1989,
issue #234, page 4. ]
SIMPLE SOLUTION TO ANI CONTROVERSY
There is a simple solution to the controversy over Automatic Number
Identification ("Caller ID Sparks Privacy debate," July 31).
Instead of directly displaying the caller's phone number, the ANI device
should show a code associated with each caller. Usually this code would be the
same as the actual phone number, but for those with unlisted numbers it would
be recognizably different. Anyone (not just ANI subscribers) should be able to
call a standard number (555-1313, perhaps) to obtain the name associated with
the code or number. In most cases, the address should also be available.
James D. Gawn
Application Development Manager
Millersville University
Millersville, Pa.
Here goes my comments:
What?? Doesn't this defeat the purpose of an unlisted number!?! And,
who is going to maintain the database to call for those unlisted number? I
find Mr. Gawn's suggestion to be a bit ludicrous. I, for myself, have an
unlisted number. I would like an ANI to screen my calls but if it shows up as
"unlisted" (or whatever the word would be), I'll accept it and if it's a prank,
then press Call Trace button to the telephone company to report.
Also, do you or others want their address be known? I don't. I'd be
interested to hear from you. Patrick, what do you have to say on this matter?
(I know you do! <grin> )
Cheers!
Curtis Reid
CER2520@RITVAX.Bitnet
CER2520%RITVAX.Bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu (Internet)
[Moderator's Note: I keep my phones unlisted simply because I know all about
how the Customer Name and Address Bureau (312-796-9600) operates for area
312; and because I am familiar with cross reference directories. PT]