[comp.dcom.telecom] Billing, was Sleazy Touch-Tone Marketing Tactics

johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us (John R. Levine) (10/04/89)

In article <telecom-v09i0422m06@vector.dallas.tx.us> you write:
>[Moderator's Note: Generally, AT&T is very much at the mercy of the
>local telco as to when things like ROA get turned on; ...

I don't get it.  Do the BOCs actually compute the bills for AT&T as well
as print, mail, and collect them?  It was my impression that the LD companies
keep their own billing info based on the ANI info provided at the time of the
call, and then either send their own bills or tell the local telco what to
print on the appropriate page.  Or is AT&T different?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us, {spdcc|ima|lotus}!esegue!johnl

[Moderator's Note: AT&T and the Bell telcos were interwoven for so
many years, there are still some things about AT&T's relationship with
the telcos which don't apply to the other OCC's. I don't know for sure
if the telcos actually do the *computations* for AT&T or not; I do
know that, for example, although AT&T advertises a five percent
daytime discount for fifty cents per month to ROA customers, when I
have tried to have it put on my ROA account the message I get from
AT&T service reps is I can't have it because "... Illinois Bell is not
set up for it right now...."  Likewise, AT&T insisted to me that they
were not the ones to toll-restrict 415-976 from Chicago customers;
".... Illinois Bell made the decision..."; and when I made an inquiry
about MCI's new five bucks an hour plan on Saturdays, their rep was
eager to take my order but cautioned that "... Illinois Bell usually
takes five working days to process our orders...." The local telcos
seem to be the ones to do much of the programming/record keeping.  PT]