[comp.dcom.telecom] MCI Sues AT&T

Schwartz.osbunorth@xerox.com (10/12/89)

>McGowan was particularly irked by a claim that MCI's fax service has
>57 percent more problems than AT&T faxes. He said that number was
>arrived at by figuring the difference between AT&T service -- with 4.9
>percent errors -- and MCI, with 7.7 percent errors. Rather than
>reporting the 2.8 percent difference, the ad claims a 57 percent
>higher rate -- the percentage increase between 4.9 percent and 7.7
>percent.

>"Talk about misleading," McGowan said.

I'm not a fan of AT&T, but 7.7 percent errors vs. 4.9 percent errors
IS a 57 percent higher error rate!

If these were plane crashes we were talking about, we would certainly
say that airline X has 57 percent more crashes than airline Y.

Saying that MCI has 2.8 percent more errors would be misleading.

I think McGowan should get "particularly irked" about some OTHER
example of misleading advertising on the part of AT&T.

Victor Schwartz

[Moderator's Note: McGowan is asking that AT&T be forced to discontinue
all advertising of their products and services for a full year, and then
at that point to submit future ads for judicial review and approval.
Knowing McGowan, I'm amazed he didn't simply ask that AT&T be forced to
discontinue all operations and turn over all their customers to him. That
would make it a lot easier to build his empire.   PT]