[comp.dcom.telecom] AT&T Long Lines

gabe@sirius.ctr.columbia.edu (Gabe Wiener) (10/08/89)

I was just thinking about the AT&T Long Lines that have been used in
this country for decades.  I'm sure all of these questions have
ridiculously simple answers, but here goes anyway.

1. Over the _really_ long runs, such as through the Rocky Mountains,
   or through the deserts of the southwest, how do they prevent
   line resistance from degrading the signal to a point where it would
   become undetectable?

2. When one of those lines is damaged out in the middle of nowhere,
   and the damage is _inside_ the cable, how do they locate it?
   Moreover, how do they splice in a new piece of cable?  In other
   words, how do they connect up those hundreds of individual lines?
   It would be like trying to rewire a spinal cord.

3. Are the long-lines used today by AT&T digital or analog?  Sprint
   obviously is touting their fiber-optics, but what is AT&T doing?
   Do they still use the analog long-lines that they've been using for
   years?  Or do they send the signals over them via a digital encoder?

Thanks...

Gabe Wiener - Columbia Univ.     "This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings
gabe@ctr.columbia.edu             to be seriously considered as a means of
gmw1@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu       communication. The device is inherently of
72355.1226@compuserve.com         no value to us."  -Western Union memo, 1877

myerston@unix.sri.com (Hector Myerston) (10/09/89)

Err.... Long Lines is a name not a descriptor.  The actual "Lines" are
the Long Distance network consisting of Microwave, Coax, Fiber and
yes, "lines" or cable.  All of these utilize some form multiplexing
carriers with their attendant repeaters to compensate for the
distances involved.

gentry@kcdev.uucp (Art Gentry) (10/10/89)

In article <telecom-v09i0436m04@vector.dallas.tx.us>, gabe@sirius.ctr.
columbia.edu (Gabe Wiener) writes:

> I was just thinking about the AT&T Long Lines that have been used in
> this country for decades.  I'm sure all of these questions have
> ridiculously simple answers, but here goes anyway.

> 1. Over the _really_ long runs, such as through the Rocky Mountains,
>    or through the deserts of the southwest, how do they prevent
>    line resistance from degrading the signal to a point where it would
>    become undetectable?

We use repeaters, spaced anywhere from 1 to 30 miles, depending on the
type of carrier technology.  These repeaters are powered by DC current
carried down the same pairs of the transmission.  Each direction takes
one pair, one for the E->W and the other for W->E (no, I'm sorry, but
AT&T does not go N->S or S->N <smile>) Actually, all repeaters will
show an East/West transmission, just to keep things easy.

On the older technology based repeaters, they were vacumn tube
amplifiers; later came solid state amps; and now with digital
transmission, they are not repeaters anymore, but rather regenerators.
They actually regenerate the signal at each repeater location, rather
than just amplify it.  This has the immediate advantage of not
amplifying the noise base along with the signal.

> 2. When one of those lines is damaged out in the middle of nowhere,
> and the damage is _inside_ the cable, how do they locate it?
> Moreover, how do they splice in a new piece of cable?  In other
> words, how do they connect up those hundreds of individual lines?
> It would be like trying to rewire a spinal cord.

Ahhhh, back in the good-ol-days....:-} All the wires within a cable
are color coded, in pairs.  In larger cables, pairs were grouped into
bunches, which in turn, were color coded themselves.  So while tedious,
it was not overly difficult to match pairs in a splice.  As to locating
the fault, it's really pretty simple, you just measure the resistance
out to the fault, use a formula (which has long since escaped me) to
figure out the distance from the test board to the problem.  Careful
measurments and calculations would usually drop the splicer right on top
of the problem.

> 3. Are the long-lines used today by AT&T digital or analog?  Sprint
> obviously is touting their fiber-optics, but what is AT&T doing?
> Do they still use the analog long-lines that they've been using for
> years?  Or do they send the signals over them via a digital encoder?

The answers are: we are rapidly converting our entire network over to
digital transmission, where we are in that project, I can only guess.
I've been out of the toll end of the business for about 10 years now;
yes, we still have some analog facilities on-line, but they are being
replaced; and yes, we do use digital encoders, crude way to call it,
but in fact that's basicly what they do.

> Thanks...

You're welcome...

| R. Arthur Gentry     AT&T Communications     Kansas City, MO     64106 |
| Email: attctc!kcdev!gentry        ATTMail: attmail!kc4rtm!gentry       |
| The UNIX BBS: 816-221-0475        The Bedroom BBS: 816-637-4183        |
| $include {std_disclaimer.h}       "I will make a quess" - Spock - STIV |

ehr@uncecs.edu (Ernest H. Robl) (10/13/89)

In article <telecom-v09i0438m05@vector.dallas.tx.us>, myerston@unix.sri.com
(Hector Myerston) writes:

> Err.... Long Lines is a name not a descriptor.  The actual "Lines" are
> the Long Distance network consisting of Microwave, Coax, Fiber and
> yes, "lines" or cable.  All of these utilize some form multiplexing
> carriers with their attendant repeaters to compensate for the
> distances involved.

And, if I remember correctly, AT&T Long Lines is also the name of a
ship (presumably owned by AT&T) that is used in laying trans- ocean
cables.  I saw the ship docked in a North Carolina port about a year
ago, and it was quite obvious what it was from (1) the name, (2) the
deck equipment, and (3) the AT&T colors and logo.

  Ernest

My opinions are my own and probably not IBM-compatible.--ehr
Ernest H. Robl  (ehr@ecsvax)  (919) 684-6269 w; (919) 286-3845 h
Systems Specialist (Tandem System Manager), Library Systems,
027 Perkins Library, Duke University, Durham, NC  27706  U.S.A.