henry@garp.mit.edu (Henry Mensch) (06/09/90)
In reply to Frank Earl's note ... I would reckon one of the problems is that most people don't know where the FBI's jurisdiction begins or where the Secret Service's jurisdiction ends. I had a visit on Friday afternoon from an FBI agent and it seemed to be mostly reasonable, except he identified himself as being from a unit that I wouldn't associate with this sort of investigation. # Henry Mensch / <henry@garp.mit.edu> / E40-379 MIT, Cambridge, MA # <hmensch@uk.ac.nsfnet-relay> / <henry@tts.lth.se> / <mensch@munnari.oz.au>
mnemonic@cs.utexas.edu (Mike Godwin) (06/13/90)
In article <8820@accuvax.nwu.edu> henry@garp.mit.edu writes: >In reply to Frank Earl's note ... I would reckon one of the problems >is that most people don't know where the FBI's jurisdiction begins or >where the Secret Service's jurisdiction ends. I had a visit on Friday >afternoon from an FBI agent and it seemed to be mostly reasonable, >except he identified himself as being from a unit that I wouldn't >associate with this sort of investigation. Secret Service jurisdiction over computer crimes is set out in 18 USC 1030(d): The United States Secret Service shall, in addition to any other agency having such authority, have the authority to investigate offenses under this section. [18 USC 1030 is titled "Fraud and related activity in connection with computers.] Such authority of the United States Secret Service shall be exercised in accordance with an agreement which shall be entered into by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General. There is a similar provision in 18 USC 1029, which concerns "Fraud and related activity in connection with access devices." Mike Godwin, UT Law School Just another bar-exam nerd mnemonic@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (512) 346-4190