[comp.dcom.telecom] GSM: Group Special Mobile or Global Standard Mobile?

covert@covert.enet.dec.com (John R. Covert 15-Jun-1990 1626) (06/16/90)

The Pan-European digital cellular system being planned for
implementation over the next five years has the acronym "GSM".

In Digest V10#435, Kolkka Olavi claims this stands for Global System
Mobile, which is also what I used to think it stood for, but only
because it seemed logical, not because I had ever seen that in print.

In an article I posted recently, I referred to it as Group Special
Mobile, based on an article published in the Swiss PTT's technical
journal which I recently read.

Who's right?  Kolkka or the Swiss PTT?

BTW, both Kolkka and I are not happy with the fact that the U.S. will
not be implementing a compatible digital cellular standard that would
have allowed U.S. <--> Europe roaming.

However, it may be that GSM doesn't have characteristics that the
telcos here think are critical.  Certainly it is not compatible with
AMPS, which would mean that dual-mode phones would be much more
difficult to implement.

It would probably also mean that hybrid systems, part digital and part
analog, could not be operated.  As far as I know, the European PTTs
are not planning any sort of easy phaseover from the existing networks
to GSM.


/john