[comp.dcom.telecom] PacBell Coinphone False Info

news@accuvax.nwu.edu (USENET News System) (07/02/90)

While at a country club on Saturday, I needed to make a phone call.  I
found the payphone, and was relieved to see that it was Pacific Bell
and not one of the private companies.  I double checked the
"information card" which all of the coin phones in CA. seem to have
these days, and indeed it said that BOTH coin calls AND calling card
calls would be handled by AT&T.  HOWEVER, when I entered in the
calling card number, I head a male voice saying, "Thank you for using
Com Systems."  I never thought I would see a BOC payphone which
displays misinformation like this one did.  I immediately called AT&T
at (800) 222-0300 (knowing that this wasn't the right number but
hoping they would know the right number).

After a few minutes, she connected me with someone who asked me for
the phone number and the hours of business.  She then told me that in
the future I should call Pac Bell, and that they are the ones who
should know about it.  I explained to her that AT&T is the one being
hurt by this and they should want to know about it.  She refused to
believe that it had anything to do with AT&T and she kept telling me
that "They can choose any long distance service they want."  Am I
crazy here?


#Ron
ronnie@eddie.mit.edu
(213) 443 - 9688

[Moderator's Note: No, you are not crazy. You should have heard the
referrals I got when I asked about red-lining certain neighborhoods
last week. I was told to call New York Tel, Pac Bell, GTE, South
Central Bell, you name it. Anybody but AT&T. It was the fault of the
phone companies. One AT&T rep said it was 'The Mexico Telephone
Company which asked us to disallow those calls ...' <snicker> ... and
when I called Corporate Public Relations and asked them, they promised
to call back ... and haven't so far.   PT]

Edward_Greenberg@cso.3mail.3com.com (07/08/90)

Ron Schnell writes:

>..I never thought I would see a BOC payphone which displays 
>misinformation like this one did.  

>She then told me that in the future I should call Pac Bell, and 
>that they are the ones who should know about it.  

Ron goes on to suggest that AT&T should have done something about it,
and, indeed, they might have taken a report, but then, they'd have to
do the same thing that they suggested ... Call Pacific Bell.

I found a payphone in a restaurant recently, that was labelled AT&T,
and gave some sleezy LD service instead.  I called Pacific Bell Repair
Service and reported it, and it was fixed the next day!  Since they
control the programming, I wouldn't think of calling AT&T for the
problem.