[comp.dcom.telecom] ANI and AMA Question

den0@midway.uchicago.edu (funky chicken) (09/05/90)

In the process of recording information for billing, are there any
times when the originating or destination number is not recorded?

I suspect there are.  For example, I recall that, in SxS offices with
ANI, each phone number's sleeve wire was cabled to a grid of bus
panels.  Each directory number terminated on a card which held 10
numbers.  An identifier would come by and hierarchically (sp?) scan
this bus system for a 5800 hz which identified the calling number.
However, my memory tells me that all the directory numbers associated
with a PBX were fed into a single number network associated with the
primary or billing number.  If this were the case, wouldn't ANI always
identify the calling number as being the primary number, regardless of
the actual line used?

Is this true and are there similar cases with ESS?  I would think it
would be wasteful to record all of the numbers called on an AMA tape
if many of them do not result in charges.  When I used my modem
extensively, I had a service which allowed me to make unlimited calls
within my LATA for a a monthly fee of $25.  Except for analyzing
traffic patterns, there would seem to be no reason to keep detailed
logs of calls in this sort of situation.

Hmmm.  I suppose that it is, unfortunately, improper to refer to SxS
in the past tense.


Matt Funkchick