[comp.dcom.telecom] More on Suspected AOS Story

roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) (09/26/90)

	A few weeks ago, I told a story about what I had to go through
to place an AT&T calling card call from a phone in a Manhattan (area
code 212) hospital room to Mt. Sinai on Long Island (516).  Various
people suggested I was silly to use the calling card at all, since
that forced me to pay Long Distance rates on what many people
suspected was really an intra-LATA call.

	Anyway, I got my Universal Card bill yesterday.  There's the
call; placed to Port Jefferson (next town over from Mt. Sinai, so
that's OK) at the right time and date.  The kicker is where the call
was placed from: Orange, NJ (201)!  I called the customer service 800
number to enquire about this, and got no good explanation as to why
the call originated from the NJ number.  What was really interesting,
was she suggested that it actually came out cheaper that way, since
you only get the 10% discount (rounded up, BTW, $0.20 on a $1.95 call)
on calls between area codes.  I pointed out that Manhattan and Port
Jeff are not the same area code, and requested the rate to Port
Jefferson, NY from both Manhattan, NY and Orange, NJ.  She said they
were exactly the same.

	Now I'm really confused.  Two questions.  Is it reasonable
that the rates from Manhattan and Orange, NJ are really identical?
And (more interesting) why is the call shown as originating in New
Jersey at all?