[comp.dcom.telecom] Southwestern Bell "COCOT"!

peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) (02/24/91)

Today I was in Fulshear, a little town to the west of Houston, Texas.
I had stopped to get some really good Barbecue.

My wife mentioned that a friend lived in Brookshire another little
town a few miles away, so we decided I should call them and see if
they'd like us to come over. The phone was a SWB phone, but I read the
info card anyway, and sure enough there was a little line "Long
distance service provided by ITI". What the hell, it's only a couple
of miles. I dialed directory assistance %, got the number (it was
barely audible) and then dialed Brookshire.

"Please insert one dollar and tewnty five cents for the first minute".

Blow that for a joke. I called on my Sprint card. We shall see what
happens when the bill comes.

Moral: just because the phone is a "Bell" phone doesn't mean it's not
a no-armed bandit.

% Directory assistance gave me an old number, so it took two calls to
  get to the other end. I guess ITI (whoever they are) doesn't get
  updates.


peter@taronga.uucp.ferranti.com


[Moderator's Note: We covered this topic a few months ago here. John
Higdon had maintained that the coin phone business was still in the
hands of AT&T. I noted that in Chicago the 'genuine' IBT payphone
cards all had a space to indicate which carrier handled the long
distance traffic. The consensus was that AT&T handled the coin traffic
by default, and the zero plus stuff went partly to AT&T and the rest
to various carriers as per the notice on each phone. From what you are
saying, it looks like Texas / SBT is doing the same thing.  PAT]