[comp.dcom.telecom] Your Evolving Phone Number

AAT@vtmsl.bitnet (Asif Taiyabi) (02/17/91)

The following article  appeared in the  American Heritage of Invention
and Technology.

                        **************
 
Your Evolving Phone Number
 
BY RICHARD BRODSKY
 
More  and more commercial phone  numbers  are being advertised with  a
name or word as part of the  number. We  are urged to dial 335-DIET or
970-LOAN. This is a small historical regression,  requiring the use of
letters that the phone company made obsolete decades ago.
 
Where did the old alphanumeric dial plate come from? Most of the world
never used  letters.  And where  did it go?  The story   begins in the
telephone's infancy.
 
At  first, central-office  operators sat at  switchboards,  completing
connections in response to   spoken  requests  like "Ring  Dr.  Smith,
please." There were few enough phone lines so the operator simply knew
where to plug in for the call. That began to change during an outbreak
of the  measles in Lowell, Massachusetts,  in 1879. The  town  doctor,
Moses Parker, feared that if all four Lowell operators fell ill, their
substitutes would have trouble connecting people unless every line got
a number. The idea caught on.
 
In  the  1880s telephone  service quadrupled in  the  nation's settled
areas. Cities soon had not only a central office and phone numbers but
exchanges in other  parts of town,  so callers now  asked for Main  or
Central plus the  subscriber's several-digit  number. Branch exchanges
usually took their names from their relative geography.  St. Louis had
Main and Central; Baltimore, Eastern; and San Francisco, West.
 
As  new exchanges proliferated,  they  usually  took their names  from
streets or neighborhoods: thus  Brooklyn's Bensonhurst, Los  Angeles's
Hollywood, and Boston's Commonwealth.  Bell devised phonetic  tests to
help make sure only easily understood names were chosen.
 
By the time dialed calling was introduced in the Bell System, in 1921,
the exchange names were so ingrained that Bell Telephone kept them on.
William G. Blauvelt  of AT&T had  divided the alphabet into  groups of
three letters for each of  the dial's openings  in  1917. He omitted Q
because of its infrequency, and the rarely used Z was relegated to the
zero (operator) slot and eventually dropped as well.  Because c single
phone-number pulse  could  be transmitted when  the receiver lifted or
the finger wheel was jarred, no calls would be initiated until a pulse
signal of at least 2 was received.  Thus the  number 1 got  no letters
attached to it.
 
Dialing swept the nation,  but  only large cities used  exchange  name
dialing; in  small towns  one still   had  only to  dial a   three- or
four-digit number. For instance, in Walnut  Creek, California, if your
number was 1407, locally you dialed 1407. From out  of  town you asked
for Walnut Creek 1407. Across the bay in San Francisco,  if you wanted
Sutter 1407, you would dial SU-1407; from afar you'd  dial 211 for the
longlines operator and say,  "I'd like San  Francisco,  please: Sutter
1407."
 
When neighborhood and street names started to run out, the Bell System
recommended  new   names. Bell of   Pennsylvania looked to   trees, so
Pittsburgh and  Philadelphia wound up  in the 1930s with  shared names
like Locust, Poplar, and Walnut.
 
Seven-digit numbers became standard only after World War II.  New York
City had pioneered them in the early 1930s  when it began inserting an
"exchange-designation number" after the  two- letter exchange  prefix.
Thus were born numbers like CAnal 6-5108.
 
By the mid-1950s all other major cities were converted to this system,
retiring such diverse combinations as Chicago's three letters and four
digits,  Cleveland's two letters and   four digits, and  Dallas's  one
letter and four digits.   In  1961, Bell  Telephone announced that  it
would   phase out exchange name dialing   city by city. Pittsburgh and
Cincinnati  began conversion  in, 1962; Philadelphia  and Seattle were
the last   to  change, in  1978.   The now classic  combination of two
letters and five numbers had  been a fully  national standard for less
than a decade.
 
All-number calling was  introduced for several reasons. Mainly,  there
weren't enough workable letter  combinations. Exchanges like  571  had
stayed  unavailable because  letters like JKL  (5) and PRS(7) wouldn't
combine. All-number  calling  also  eliminated    confusingly  spelled
exchanges like  New  York's  RHinelander,  prevented  mix  ups between
similar letters and  numbers  like O and 0,  and made possible  direct
dialing from Europe and other parts of the world.   Most countries had
never had letters on their dials.
 
The old  central-office names are  gone from the phone  book, but they
resonate in memory. They seem to stand  for an era - the  era of Glenn
Miller's "Pennsylvania 6-5000," of John O'Hara's Butterfield 8, and of
Barbara Stanwyck's   closely clutched   list of phone  numbers in  the
chilling 1948 film Sorry, Wrong Number. 335-DIET just isn't the same.

                           *******************

Richard Brodsky is a medical librarian and collector of telephone
memorabilia in Pittsburgh.

                           *******************
 
Asif Taiyabi
 
Management Systems Lab.        (703) 231-3501
1900 Kraft Drive               aat@vtmsl.bitnet
Blacksburg, VA 24060           aat%vtmsl@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu


[Moderator's Note: Thanks for sending this along. The oldest exchange
in Chicago (312-236) comes from 1879 when there was but one exchange
and it was known as the 'central'. When a second office opened, it was
across the downtown area on Franklin Street (312-372), so it became
known as Franklin and the original retained the name Central. These
evolved into FRAnklin and CENtral when manual service was phased out
and dialing started (1939). When 3-L / 5-D changed to 2-L / 6-D these became
CEntral-6 and FRanklin-2, then a quarter century ago the final (or
most recent) change took place. The opening of the phone office at
Wabash Avenue and Congress Parkway downtown about 1890 brought us
WABash which is now 312-922. Many people *were* conrfused by the
names; they often dialed HP for Hyde Park instead of HY, etc.   PAT]

martin@cellar.bellcore.com (Martin Harriss (ACP)) (02/20/91)

In article <telecom11.121.4@eecs.nwu.edu> AAT@vtmsl.bitnet (Asif
Taiyabi) writes:

>When neighborhood and street names started to run out, the Bell System
>recommended  new   names. Bell of   Pennsylvania looked to   trees, so
>Pittsburgh and  Philadelphia wound up  in the 1930s with  shared names
>like Locust, Poplar, and Walnut.

Interesting.  Central Philadelphia has a Walnut Street, a Locust
Street and a Poplar Street.  These are important thorofares, I'm sure
they existed in the 1930's.  So which came first? the street or the
telephone exchange?

Martin Harriss
martin@cellar.bae.bellcore.com


[Moderator's Note: The locations came first, obviously, and the
exchange names later. The exchanges tended to be named after the
geographic area, the street they were on or a prominent nearby spot,
such as our GRAceland, located in the proximity of the cemetery by the
same name. Sometimes current events / politics was a factor: 312-842
(VICtory) was the first new dial exchange created in 1946 when manual
 ==> dial conversion was resumed following a four year hiatus during
World War II due to Western Electric's manufacturing facilities being
used full time by the government during the war. The CO had not
existed at all before the war: Overcrowded conditions in the CALumet
(312-225) CO which had to be tolerated during the war were alleviated
by breaking off a couple thousand subscribers and placing them on the
new CO when it opened ... just like an area code split today!  :) PAT]

david@cs.uow.edu.au (David E A Wilson) (02/24/91)

ct@dde.dk (Claus Tondering) writes:

> American companies, please listen to this piece of advice from a European:
> If you want business from overseas, do not include letters in your phone
> numbers. We can't use them over here.

A bigger problem is the growing use of 800 numbers (without listing
the POTS number). Overseas subscribers cannot call regular 800
numbers. We can call special six digit international 800 numbers.

Is it just coincidence that most countries auto-reverse charge numbers start
with either 800/008 or is there an international standard?


David Wilson	Dept Comp Sci, Uni of Wollongong	david@cs.uow.edu.au


[Moderator's Note: Well so far as I know, the Americans were using
this technique first, of auto-reverse charging through the use of 800.
I think as other PTT's picked up on the idea they just went along with
the number (800) we were already using.   PAT]