[comp.dcom.telecom] Radio Reception on Telephone

Kyler Laird <lairdkb@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> (04/10/91)

I remember seeing a thread about this a while back.  I'd appreciate
any info/pointers to info.

A friend of mine has a problem with radio reception on his home
telephone.  The FCC told him to use a choke.  That's it!?  He hasn't
tried this yet, but I'd like to know what his other options are.
Also, I'd appreciate knowing the theory behind this.

Thanks!


kyler

Jeff Sicherman <sichermn@beach.csulb.edu> (04/11/91)

In article <telecom11.283.7@eecs.nwu.edu> Kyler Laird <lairdkb@mentor.
cc.purdue.edu> writes:

> A friend of mine has a problem with radio reception on his home
> telephone.  The FCC told him to use a choke.  That's it!?  He hasn't
                                        ^^^^^
> tried this yet, but I'd like to know what his other options are.
> Also, I'd appreciate knowing the theory behind this.

    On the telephone or the manufacturer ? :-)


[Moderator's Note: He could also find out where his high-powered and
probably illegal CB neighbor is located (if that is the type of radio
interference he is getting) and go cut the guy's coax!   :)     PAT]

herrickd@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com (04/16/91)

In article <telecom11.283.7@eecs.nwu.edu>, lairdkb@mentor.cc.purdue.
edu (Kyler Laird) writes:

> A friend of mine has a problem with radio reception on his home
> telephone.  The FCC told him to use a choke.  That's it!?  He hasn't
> tried this yet, but I'd like to know what his other options are.
> Also, I'd appreciate knowing the theory behind this.

Perhaps the basic idea is to find the person operating the transmitter
and choke him.


dan herrick     herrickd@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com


[Moderator's Note: There are all these 'scenarios' people come up with
-- red herrings, really -- as excuses for not having Caller ID.  From
your example above, I take it you would rather force the people to
answer the phone every time it rings -- being unable to tell in advance
who is calling -- rather than sit down with the people as one parent
speaking with another to discuss and correct the misbehavior of your
children.   PAT]

Joshua_Putnam <josh@happym.wa.com> (04/16/91)

In <telecom11.286.4@eecs.nwu.edu> sichermn@beach.csulb.edu (Jeff
Sicherman) writes:

> In article <telecom11.283.7@eecs.nwu.edu> Kyler Laird <lairdkb@mentor.
> cc.purdue.edu> writes:

>> A friend of mine has a problem with radio reception on his home
>> telephone.  The FCC told him to use a choke.  That's it!?  He hasn't

>> tried this yet, but I'd like to know what his other options are.
>> Also, I'd appreciate knowing the theory behind this.

>    On the telephone or the manufacturer ? :-)

> [Moderator's Note: He could also find out where his high-powered and
> probably illegal CB neighbor is located (if that is the type of radio
> interference he is getting) and go cut the guy's coax!   :)     PAT]

I've never known anyone with CB interference on the phone, but that
may just be luck.  Here we always have trouble with AM broadcast
stations.  Depending on the location of the phone lines, quality of
the phone, etc., the talk radio can be as loud as the person on the
other end of the line, sometimes louder.  The only phones that seem to
be immune are our old rotary-dial ones from the dark ages.  (No
touch-tone in my house :-(

The stations are all operating legally, and the phone company used to
provide specially-modified phones back before customers could buy
their own.  (The phones have a capacitor soldered across the speaker
terminals.)  For more serious cases, a phone line filter is available.

The Amateur Radio Relay League (ARRL) Handbook, available in any good
library, has a detailed section on interference that includes
solutions for phone interference and part numbers for the various
filters, chokes, capacitors the phone manufacturers use.


Josh Putnam            josh@happym.wa.com              206/463-9399 ext.102
Happy Man Corp.   4410 SW Pt. Robinson Road   Vashon Island, WA  98070-7399


Moderator's Note: If you want to see a place where AM stations make
for bad reception on the radio itself, try an area just outside
Wheaton, IL where the transmitters for WGN (720 AM) and WBBM (780 AM)
are located about a half-mile from each other. When driving within
about a mile on any side of those transmitters, you can tune *nothing*
on your car radio but them. Solid WGN signal across the whole AM band
for quite a distance, then the same from WBBM for awhile. There is a
space in the middle of the two where you get only heterodyne from the
two of them together. Listen in sometime if you are driving past!   PAT]

Nick Sayer <nsayer@uop.uop.edu> (04/22/91)

herrickd@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:

> In article <telecom11.283.7@eecs.nwu.edu>, lairdkb@mentor.cc.purdue.
> edu (Kyler Laird) writes:

>> A friend of mine has a problem with radio reception on his home
>> telephone.  The FCC told him to use a choke.  That's it!?  He hasn't
>> tried this yet, but I'd like to know what his other options are.
>> Also, I'd appreciate knowing the theory behind this.

> Perhaps the basic idea is to find the person operating the transmitter
> and choke him.

Dan just lit my fuse.

I am an amateur radio operator and have been on the receiving end of
an irate neighbor who had a shoddy "Time Magazine" phone. My
transmitter, operating legally, and in total compliance with FCC
regulations (and then some!) was blamed by the idiot because, of
course, nothing ever went wrong when I was not transmitting.

In RFI troubleshooting, being "the cause" and being "at fault" are two
different things. It's stupid and irresponsible remarks like Dan's
that continue to perpetuate the attitude that force Hams to constantly
be on the defensive. Dan owes all of us (450,000 in the United States
alone) an appology.


Nick Sayer      mrapple@quack.sac.ca.us 
N6QQQ  [44.2.1.17]   209-952-5347 (Telebit)  

hpa@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin) (04/22/91)

>> A friend of mine has a problem with radio reception on his home
>> telephone.  The FCC told him to use a choke.  That's it!?  He hasn't
>> tried this yet, but I'd like to know what his other options are.
>> Also, I'd appreciate knowing the theory behind this.

Well, a "choke" is a fairly simple device consisting mainly of
capacitors and inductors and the purpouse of which is to short out the
RF radiation before it gets detected in your phone.  It can be
effective sometimes, and totally worthless at times.

> Perhaps the basic idea is to find the person operating the transmitter
> and choke him.

Aaahh, that is why you can always read in ham radio magazines about
angry neighbours coming to the local ham to complain about RFI and TVI
(Radio Frequency Interference and TeleVision Interference) BEFORE they
even have gotten the transmitter out of the box.  Yes, that seems
quite common.


IDENTITY:   Anvin, H. Peter           STATUS:    Student
INTERNET:   hpa@casbah.acns.nwu.edu   FIDONET:   1:115/989.4
HAM RADIO:  N9ITP, SM4TKN             RBBSNET:   8:970/101.4
EDITOR OF:  The Stillwaters BBS List  TEACHING:  Swedish

nanook@eskimo.celestial.com (Robert Dinse) (04/23/91)

In article <telecom11.283.7@eecs.nwu.edu>, lairdkb@mentor.cc.purdue.
edu (Kyler Laird) writes:

> A friend of mine has a problem with radio reception on his home
> telephone.  The FCC told him to use a choke.  That's it!?  He hasn't
> tried this yet, but I'd like to know what his other options are.
> Also, I'd appreciate knowing the theory behind this.

     I am fortunate enough to live close to a 50 KW AM stations
transmitter tower and it has the unfortunate side effect of turning
everything into a radio receiver. A couple of .001 capacitors from
each side of the line to ground seems to work adequately for getting
the RF out of the phone here.

     But another thing that can complicate the issue, the RF would
never be detected and become audio if it weren't for something
non-linear playing detector. As it happens, phones generally have
clipping diodes across the receiver, the purpose of which is to keep
clicks from blowing your ear-drums out, but they also tend to make
good RF detectors.

oberman@ptavv.llnl.gov (04/23/91)

In article <telecom11.299.10@eecs.nwu.edu>, hpa@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
(H. Peter Anvin) writes:

> Well, a "choke" is a fairly simple device consisting mainly of
> capacitors and inductors and the purpouse of which is to short out the
> RF radiation before it gets detected in your phone.  It can be
> effective sometimes, and totally worthless at times.
 
Well, a "choke" is not "a fairly simple device consisting mainly of
capacitors and inductors". That's a filter, also commonly called a
trap. A choke is simply an inductor which is, in turn, simply a coil.
Coils work because they present an impedence which increases with
frequency. And you want to block RFI while allowing in audio. I'm not
familiar with the impedences in telephones, but I suspect that a 10 mH
inductor should do the trick. It would present a 63 K impedence at 1
MHz.

Frankly a little PI filter made of two chokes and a capacitor would
work better, but just a choke will probably do the job.


R. Kevin Oberman			Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Internet: oberman@icdc.llnl.gov		(415) 422-6955

Disclaimer: Don't take this too seriously. I just like to improve my typing
and probably don't really know anything useful about anything. Especially
anything gnu.