[comp.dcom.telecom] The MFJ, "Shared Facilities" and "Condominium Arrangements"

atoscano@attmail.com (05/16/91)

The MFJ stipulates that the Bell Operating Companies and AT&T may
share facilities for up to eight years after divestiture.  Those eight
years will expire in a few months.  What facilities, if any, are still
"shared" today?  Does "Shared Facilities" include the "Condominium
Arrangements" created to split up wire center buildings containing
both local (end office) and toll switches?  Examples which come to
mind: Austin-Greenwood, Chicago-Canal, San Antonio-Capitol.  Will AT&T
have to move out of such buildings by the end of the year?


A Alan Toscano             Voice:  +1 713 236 6616     AT&T Mail:  atoscano
<atoscano@attmail.com>     Telex (UT):   156232556     CIS:       73300,217


[Moderator's Note: The way I have heard it is they will remain as they
are but will no longer be legally 'sharing'. In the past, all floor
space and facilities was owned in common. Now, both the LEC and AT&T
are tenants in a 'condominium-style' building where each separately
owns their own floor space and equipment, and they do not share their
own floor space and equipment with anyone. Both are members of an
association which owns the building and the common areas. Nothing in
the MFJ said the two could not be tenants in the same condominium
building. They will all still use the same restroom, elevator, and
cafeteria facilities, which are owned by the association, rather than
AT&T or the LEC individually.  I suspect both entities are smart
enough to keep their use of the common facilities at arms-length to
appease the judge, bless his soul ... or does His Honor presume that
two executives, one from the LEC and one from AT&T,  will spend
quality time together each day seated in ajoining stalls in the men's
room plotting to put Sprint out of business, using the walls to write
secret inter-company memos to each other?  PAT]