bfalcon@cs.utexas.edu (Bob Falcon) (05/19/91)
Hi Pat, all, I just came across this in the Philadelphia {TV Guide} 5/18-24 edition: Dial - A - Flick gets test run If VCTV catches on, your local video store just might replace the phonograph record as America's latest technological relic. By the end of the year, 450 Denver Colorado cable subscribers will be able to order more than 1000 feature films, any time they choose when TCI, the nation's largest cable operator, AT&T and US West begin testing "Viewer-Controlled Cable Television." Unlike pay-per-view , which delivers movies at pre-designated times, VCTV's offerings can be ordered 24 hours a day by telephone or a special remote-control. [ a converter box ? --BF ] Various prices will be tested during the 18-month trial, but are expected to be comparable to those found in video stores. [ around here that's $1.99- $2.99 for the video store and $3.99-$4.99 for our pay-per-view <per view> --BF ] This year consumers are expected to spend more than $13.2 billion in video rentals and sales. ---Herma M. Rosenthal [T.V. Guide] ----------- I predict the trial 'test' prices will be to see how much people would be willing to pay [ as usual ] instead of comparable to video store rentals, but that's pessimistic me <grin>. I like the idea of VCTV, but I don't even rent pay-per-view movies now, becuase of the prices.<grin> Have a good one! Catchya later, Bob Falcon [ Co-Sysop : Turbo 386 Remote Access ] [ 1:273/906 @Fidonet ][ (215) 745-9774 HST/DS ] UUCP: bfalcon@rescon.uucp : { cdin-1 || dsinc.dsi.com } !alba2l!rescon!bfalcon
Tom Streeter <streeter@athena.cs.uga.edu> (05/22/91)
It seems to me that I read in "Electronic Media" that the view-on-demand system to be tested in Denver by TCI will involve stocking a room with a couple of hundred VCRs and manually feeding the movies to customers. They want to see if the concept works before investing in the equipment necessary to automate the process. This from the company which is refusing to upgrade any of its systems until it knows whether or not the RBOCs will be allowed into the business in their own service areas ... ("Yes, let's freeze our lousy service in place so ANY alternative will look good!") Tom Streeter streeter@athena.cs.uga.edu
Paul Fuqua <pf@islington-terrace.csc.ti.com> (05/23/91)
streeter at athena.cs.uga.edu (Tom Streeter) wrote: > This from the company [TCI] which is refusing to upgrade any of its > systems until it knows whether or not the RBOCs will be allowed into > the business in their own service areas TCI may want to be in the telephone business -- in Dallas, they've come up with the cable equivalent of "slamming." They subscribed all their customers, no exceptions, to a new premium channel, free for one month. The catch is that at the end of the month, the customer has to call to unsubscribe, or be charged for the following months. Paul Fuqua pf@csc.ti.com, ti-csl!pf Texas Instruments Computer Science Center, Dallas, Texas
carroll@cs.washington.edu> (05/24/91)
I hate to interrupt all this talk of Brave New Technology and what not, but whatever happened to the interactive cable/videotex service that was pioneered in the 70's in Columbus, OH ? How do they say it in French? Plus ce change... Jeff Carroll carroll@ssc-vax.boeing.com
"Ralph W. Hyre" <rhyre@cinoss1.att.com> (05/29/91)
In article <telecom11.393.4@eecs.nwu.edu> Jeff Carroll <carroll@ssc-vax. boeing.com> writes: > whatever happened to the interactive cable/videotex service that > was pioneered in the 70's in Columbus, OH ? The QUBE system was nuked when Warner Cable got into some financial trouble in the early 80's and the decided to not throw away any more money on it. (They also relinquished their Pittsburgh franchise to TCI around the same time -- I don't know how they could have lost money there -- almost EVERYBODY 'needs' cable TV in Pittsburgh due to wierd reception characteristics.) There weren't very many applications for it. I recall there being a game show that allowed the viewing audience to win prizes. QUBE sites in Columbus, Cincinnati, and someplace in Texas (Dallas, I think) were linked for the game. The other application was to choose pay-per-view movies. We never had a videotex application in Cincinnati.