tim@dciem.UUCP (Tim Pointing) (02/09/84)
There is an inconsistancy in the way "-v" is handled in the V7 grep's (fgrep/egrep/grep). The "-v" flag should, in my humble opinion, invert the exit status of grep. I.e. if every line does contain the pattern (grep -v doesn't pass any lines to stdout), then the exit status of grep should indicate failure. If "grep" fails then "grep -v" shouldn't fail!. I hesitate in fixing this at our site since this could cause problems for scripts that are sent to/from us. Does anybody know if this "misfeature" has been fixed in 4.?/SIII/SV ? tomorrow I'll get around to doing what should have been done yesterday... -- Tim Pointing, DCIEM {allegra,ubc-vision,linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd}!utcsrgv!dciem!tim or {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!dciem!tim
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) (02/11/84)
Tim Pointing complains: There is an inconsistancy in the way "-v" is handled in the V7 grep's (fgrep/egrep/grep). The "-v" flag should, in my humble opinion, invert the exit status of grep. I.e. if every line does contain the pattern (grep -v doesn't pass any lines to stdout), then the exit status of grep should indicate failure. If "grep" fails then "grep -v" shouldn't fail!. Are you looking at the code or the documentation? The behavior that you seek is exactly the way egrep, grep, and fgrep really do behave on our system, which is essentially vanilla V7. The original Bell manual page botched the description of this, but the programs do things right. -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry