[comp.sys.dec] MicroVax II configurations

michael@ddsw1.UUCP (Michael Duebner) (08/05/87)

AERA is in the process of getting together a new mini computer system.  We
would like to use our current software which can be transfered from our
current RSTS/E PDP11/73 to VMS.  We have talked to several DEC OEMs on
possible configurations for our new systems and have received different
answers to the same questions!!  

We would like to use the following configuration

MicroVax II BA-123
	16 MB of RAM
	4 RD-54 fixed disk drives
	4 DHV-11M communications boards
	TK-50 tape drive

Some OEMs say it is ok to put all these drives into the machine, others say
it will not work internally, some would have to go into external cabinets.
Now, which version is correct?  Please include any other hints and tips you
might have on our desired configuration.


-- 

Michael Duebner				UUCP : ...ihnp4!ddsw1!michael
           (Help is only a phone call away for members of AERA)

kevin@violet.berkeley.edu (Kevin Baranski-Walker) (08/06/87)

Four RD-type devices will work fine in the BA-123 chassis.  The
configuration that you listed is precisely that of several of my
machines here.
Kevin

cetron@utah-cs.UUCP (Edward J Cetron) (08/06/87)

In article <269@ddsw1.UUCP> michael@ddsw1.UUCP (Michael Duebner) writes:
>
>We would like to use the following configuration
>
>MicroVax II BA-123
>	16 MB of RAM
>	4 RD-54 fixed disk drives
>	4 DHV-11M communications boards
>	TK-50 tape drive

	1. there is enough PHYSICAL room in a ba123 for 5, 5&1/4" form
factor devices. 

	2. The RD54's take a lot of POWER.

	3. RD54's get HOT....

	4. Given the current ba123 cooling system, and power supplies (dual)
DEC  only supports three RD53's (or 2 RD54's and one RD53 or ...) and one
TK50 per box.

	5. personally, I would use two RD54's and the tk50 in the box, and
two RD54's in external boxes with external power supplies.... 

	6. but then again, I can't remember if you can run the signals out
from the distribution panel of a ba123...if you can, 5 is the best approach.
(doesn't the external boxes require rqdxe's??)

-ed cetron
cetron@cs.utah.edu

tli@sargas.usc.edu (Tony Li) (08/06/87)

4 RD54s seems like an awkward (and expensive) way to get your
diskspace requirements.  You should be able to get third party drives
which are external, cheaper, and bigger.

;-)
Tony Li - USC University Computing Services	"Fene mele kiki bobo"
Uucp: oberon!tli						-- Joe Isuzu
Bitnet: tli@uscvaxq, tli@ramoth
Internet: tli@sargas.usc.edu

davew@gvgpsa.UUCP (David White) (08/06/87)

In article <4803@utah-cs.UUCP> cetron@cs.utah.edu.UUCP (Edward J Cetron) writes:
>In article <269@ddsw1.UUCP> michael@ddsw1.UUCP (Michael Duebner) writes:
>>
>>We would like to use the following configuration
>>
>>MicroVax II BA-123
>>	16 MB of RAM
>>	4 RD-54 fixed disk drives
>>	4 DHV-11M communications boards

Why use 4 DHV's?  First, I don't think that you will have room for more
than 20 ports on the distribution panel, unless there is an option that
allows you to use 9 pin rather than 25 pin connectors.

I would recommend using terminal servers for terminal connections since
you can put the servers in the areas where the users are and you won't
have to run so many cables to your BA123 box.  I have also found that
the DHV ports tend to get used for other purposes, such as printers,
modems, direct 232 links to other computers, emulators, and other such
devices.  We have 20 ports on our system, and only 5 are used for
terminals, with the rest being used for other devices.  Hence, most of
our terminals get hung off of terminal servers.

>>	TK-50 tape drive
>
>	2. The RD54's take a lot of POWER.

I think that if you do a power study with your proposed configuration
you will find that there is not enough beef in the BA123 power supplies
to support that many RD54 devices, especially with the start up power
requirements of the RD54's.

>
>	3. RD54's get HOT....
>
>	4. Given the current ba123 cooling system, and power supplies (dual)
>DEC  only supports three RD53's (or 2 RD54's and one RD53 or ...) and one
>TK50 per box.
>
>	5. personally, I would use two RD54's and the tk50 in the box, and
>two RD54's in external boxes with external power supplies.... 

I agree with this.  There is a catch however.

>
>	6. but then again, I can't remember if you can run the signals out
>from the distribution panel of a ba123...if you can, 5 is the best approach.
>(doesn't the external boxes require rqdxe's??)

To use external RD54's in the BA123, you will have to run them off a
second RQDX3 disk controller.  The RQDXE is not supported for the BA123
box, as I found out the hard way!  You will need a cable from the
second RQDX3 to the distribution panel, and then you can plug in your
external RD54.  To add more than one external RD54, I think that you
will have to daisy-chain off the first external box.  Actually, having
two RQDX3's is not bad since it seems to give better throughput that
having 4 devices hanging of off one RQDX3.
-- 
===================================================================
Dave White		Grass Valley Group, Inc.
P.O. Box 1114   	Grass Valley, CA  95945
UUCP:	...!tektronix!gvgpsa!davew	PHONE:	+1 916 478 3052