ejw@sask.UUCP (Eric Woodsworth) (11/20/87)
I submitted a question to comp.sys.dec 3 weeks or so ago, asking if anyone had opinions on the VAXmate that they would be interested in sharing. Our department (Environment Canada) is going into an all-DEC conversion, including VAXen and VAXmates, and we are to get at least one of the latter, so I was interested in knowing whether to steer clear of them if possible. Although our larger offices will be running on Ethernet, our office will not be so blessed, so we'll be connecting via modem to the larger offices. I received several responses, which I will summarize here. Geoff Coleman (coleman@sask) says: Don't touch them. They only have one disk. You have to add the expansion box to get a hard disk. They are over priced and will hopefully die in the near future Joe Angel (angel@skyblu) says: ...this is a IBM-AT compatible machine which runs all of the known hard-case software. There is a very nice MS-Windows based interface between VaxMate and VMS, which I have seen demo-ed on a MicroVax. It seemed to work beautifully. Having said that, I think the damned things are too highly priced. You could do much more with your money if you were to consider other AT-compatible machines. As you know, the VaxMate is intended to be a network workstation, not simply an ordinary micro. Therefore it comes with an ethernet card. ... Kevin Lowey (lowey@skyblu) says: For my purposes the Vaxmate is great. However my purposes is using the machine to communicate over ethernet to the mainframe. The things I think are Great are not the Vaxmate, but rather Ethernet and Windows. Any AT machine would be just as good. I would NEVER buy a vaxmate as a stand alone machine. You have limited expansion, no colour (although that may be changing), a non-standard keyboard (although very similar to the PS/2 keyboards). You can't add anything other than a modem, memory, and a 80287 chip without buying the optional hard disk and pancake. The pancake has (only) three expansion slots so crowded together that many cards won't fit easily. The only thing the Vaxmate has going for it is the built in Ethernet support and the version of Windows out for it. Gert de Jong (ros@dnlunx) says: ....Here at DNL [Ptt Dr. Neher Laboratories, The Netherlands] one VAXmate is located and connected via DECnet with all the hosts at this site. It's really working marvellous! You can copy files, log in, etc and with DEC's special Windows version, it really is astonishing: You make a link to the Unix machine, put it in window, make a link to the VAX/VMS and hop around with your mouse from Unix to VMS, just by clicking the desired window! If you then have really nothing to do, you can shell to MS-DOS as well! Also an original IBM-AT is connected to DECnet. Also this works fine. I haven't used windows on the IMB, but I think that it is as good as on the VAXmate. If it works, of course, according to DEC's policy, the VAXmate is for a normal AT compatible highly overpriced. Alan Cabrera (13501adc@msu.bitnet) says: I've read that a VAXmate without the Ethernet connection is pretty useless. An Ethernet connection to a VAX apparently allows you to remote mount disks for seamless use on your micro. Without the Ethernet connection to your VAX, it would seem that you would be stuck with an overpriced AT clone. Norm Soley (norm@ontenv) says: We looked at the VAXmate as well. Yes it is overpriced for what it is. Unless you are working in an ETHERnet environment. The VAXmate comes with (and requires) a special version of MS-DOS which includes the ability to read RX50 diskettes under DOS. This required re-writing of the disk driver which means that some programs which talk to the disk controller directly won't work. The only one I found this with was the Utility ZERODISK but diskette "speedup" programs like VKETTE are also likely to bite it on the VAXmate. The machine also suffers from the lack of space for a second floppy, the unit comes with a 1.2 Meg floppy (like the AT) and can't be guarenteed to safely write 360K floppies. Also it would be nice if you could buy the expansion chassis (with two slots) without buying the 20 Meg hard drive...We are getting a number of the units in a deal with DEC (One for one trade on some PRO-350's that never ran the software we bought them for.....) So, from all this, I get a fairly definite picture that unless they are jammed down our throat (which is not unheard of here), I'll be spending my money on something else if I have the choice. However, as Jim Hood (jim@forgen) says, the System Services Branch of Ontario MNR [like Environment Canada] "has sold their collective souls to DEC and VMS, but what do you get for all that EXTRA money?" Wouldn't a nice set of VAXen running Ultrix, with peripheral 386 micros be more pleasant, if the core of the system HAS to be DEC? Anyway, does anyone have any favourite AT-compatibles? Thanks to all who sent opinions. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Eric Woodsworth / Canadian Wildlife Service / Saskatoon / Canada UUCP: pmbrc!ejw BITNET: WOODSWORTH@SASK Tel: (306)-975-4087 ----------------------------------------------------------------