awpsys@ultb.UUCP (Andrew W. Potter) (12/15/88)
Question: Has anyone succeeded in writing a TK50 on a TK70 drive? I understand that this works if you bulk erase the TK50 to eliminate the TK50 formatting. I also understand that the party line from DEC is that the two tapes have different formulations making this risky. My question is: Has anyone done this? How well does it work? The reason I ask is that I have crates full of old TK50 distribution media that is dying to be reused. - Andy -- Andrew W. Potter Email: awpsys@ritvax.BITNET Systems Programmer awp8101@ritcv.UUCP Information Systems and Computing Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester NY, 14623 (716) 475-6994
tony@gvgpvd.GVG.TEK.COM (Tony Ivanov) (12/17/88)
In article <258@ultb.UUCP> awpsys@ultb.UUCP (Andrew W. Potter) writes: >Question: > > Has anyone succeeded in writing a TK50 on a TK70 drive? > Yes, this seems to work fine. We bought a cheapo bulk eraser from Radio Shack and bulk erased our TK50s once. After that, we've used them in the TK70 drive with no problems and haven't had to re-erase them yet (it's been about 5 months). No problems. We are using them on an Ultrix system, but that should have no bearing on the results. -- /* My opinions... * Tony Ivanov MS-4B * ...ucbvax! */ /* shared by my company?!... * Grass Valley Group, Inc. * tektronix! */ /* you've got to be kidding! * P.O. Box 1114 * gvgpsa! */ /* "tony@gvgpvd.GVG.TEK.COM" * Grass Valley, CA 95945 * gvgpvd!tony */
michael@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Michael Duebner) (12/17/88)
In article <258@ultb.UUCP> awpsys@ultb.UUCP (Andrew W. Potter) writes: >Question: > Has anyone succeeded in writing a TK50 on a TK70 drive? >I understand that this works if you bulk erase the TK50 to eliminate >the TK50 formatting. I also understand that the party line from DEC is that >the two tapes have different formulations making this risky. >Andrew W. Potter Email: awpsys@ritvax.BITNET >Systems Programmer awp8101@ritcv.UUCP >Information Systems and Computing >Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester NY, 14623 (716) 475-6994 We have been doing this for some time now. You must bulkerase the tapes first, otherwise error messages will result. After that its no problem. We are not realizing any errors on the drive because of the use of TK-50K media. We also have quite a few DEMO tapes around the shop that have been converted to scratch backup media. However, all permanent backups are still being made on TK-52K (TK-70 media) tapes. I hate to find out a year down the road that the data is not safe. Now if the drive could also write TK-50 mode tapes it would be a really good deal. Michael Duebner UUCP : michael@ddsw1.MCS.COM Tech Svc, Buffalo Grove, IL 312/541-6550
lancaster@misadel.oz (12/18/88)
In article <258@ultb.UUCP>, awpsys@ultb.UUCP (Andrew W. Potter) writes: > Has anyone succeeded in writing a TK50 on a TK70 drive? > Me too I've got them comming out of my ears. So if I can reuse the TK50k's instead of buying more TK52's then it would be great. -- ============================================================================== |Robert Lancaster | lancaster@misadel.oz | |Management Information Systems | | |125 Dew Street | I can write in 101 computer languages | |Thebarton, South Australia, 5038. | but in English forget it. | ==============================================================================
taylort@decus.com.au (Trevor Taylor (Graphics SIG Chairman)) (01/04/89)
In article <258@ultb.UUCP>, awpsys@ultb.UUCP (Andrew W. Potter) writes: > Has anyone succeeded in writing a TK50 on a TK70 drive? > Just out of curiosity, we took a brand new TK50 and wrote a backup saveset to it on a TK70. It worked OK. However, as a matter of principle we do not intend to use TK50s this way. I can't comment on the reliability, but using BACKUP it should be OK even with a few soft errors. What really irked us however, was that in the easly days of TK70s we could not get many and one of the operators mistakenly used a few in a TK50 drive one day. Result -- TK70s that you can no longer use except as TK50s. You cannot even re-initialise them because the "smart" drive checks the tape first and says "Oh no, this is a TK50!".
karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) (01/17/89)
In article <524@decus.com.au> taylort@decus.com.au (Trevor Taylor (Graphics SIG Chairman)) writes: =In article <258@ultb.UUCP>, awpsys@ultb.UUCP (Andrew W. Potter) writes: => Has anyone succeeded in writing a TK50 on a TK70 drive? => =Just out of curiosity, we took a brand new TK50 and wrote a backup =saveset to it on a TK70. It worked OK. = =What really irked us however, was that in the easly days of TK70s =we could not get many and one of the operators mistakenly used a =few in a TK50 drive one day. Result -- TK70s that you can no =longer use except as TK50s. You cannot even re-initialise them =because the "smart" drive checks the tape first and says "Oh no, =this is a TK50!". Bulk erase the tape and try again :-) It takes a reasonably good bulk eraser to get the tape, but if you succeed, you've got a truly "blank" tape again. It appears that what the drive is checking is the volume header on the initialized tape. (Disclaimer: It works for us, no idea what it'll do for you.) -- Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, ddsw1!karl) Data: [+1 312 566-8912], Voice: [+1 312 566-8910] Macro Computer Solutions, Inc. "Quality solutions at a fair price"