knox@topaz.decus.org (04/25/91)
Change and Consensus by Marg Knox You have recently received a ballot that asks you to vote on replacing the existing DECUS U.S.Chapter bylaws and effect a reorganization of the leadership structure. As one of your two "new" Board members, beginning July 1, I urge you to vote NO at this time. I will not try to sway you with a technical discussion of group dynamics or "Who will be getting the Real power". Instead I urge you to vote NO because the fundamental effort to achieve a successful, harmonious and productive reorganization has not yet been done. It is necessary to understand the challenges we face today, and then build an organizational vision that emphasizes our strengths and neutralizes our weaknesses. WE NEED CONSENSUS. Consensus-building is a fundamental principle of the management of this Chapter. While a sufficient majority of the current Board is in favor of replacing the bylaws without further study, this majority has failed to achieve the consensus of the entire Board, the entire staff, or any of the volunteer units which you participate on, and that carry on the work of the Chapter. I prefer to seek consensus. Our DECUS values obligate the Board to truly address the concerns that have been expressed. There are processes that can be employed that will invite diversity of opinion and that will ultimately build the necessary consensus that guarantees successful change. WE NEED A TRANSITION PLAN. A critical element missing in this restructuring proposal is a detailed transition plan. This reorganization has been planned from the "top-down". The future for unit resource allocation and conflict resolution MUST be reviewed before we commit to change. Budget control, interunit policies and staff resources are but a few of these critical elements. Given that the proposal does not grant representation for each unit on the management committees, it is essential that the resulting flow of business decisions be clearly understood. WE NEED NOT RUSH. The current Board is anxious to finish its term with these substantial changes in place. You should know that the Board which will take office on July 1 would NOT have the votes to place this ballot before you. I believe that there exists no demonstrated emergency that demands immediate change at this time at the risk of affecting our ability to continue to serve our membership. If we implement less than well thought out changes, we will spend several critical years working out the details at a time when DECUS and your Board should be addressing the critical changes in the marketplace (i.e., Open Systems, changing business practices, alterations of the support level from Digital, etc.). Throughout our units there is work underway to address questions such as: What audience should we address; how can we make our services more accessible; where should we invest our precious volunteer resources to get the most "Bang for the Buck"; what industry alliances will insure that DECUS does not become an irrelevant "island"; and how can we make the most of shrinking Digital resources? I AM NOT OPPOSED TO CHANGE. Wherever I have participated in DECUS, I have participated in facilitating change, be it in the creation of new groups, services or practices. But those changes have always been born of consensus, of an understanding of our mutual goals, and not thrust upon anyone by mandate. We all know stories of companies that reorganize rather then face the difficult task of recognizing challenges, assessing strengths and weaknesses and establishing an organizational vision. Many of you are involved with your DECUS units in evaluating your unit goals, strengths, weaknesses and futures. Change must be born of this consensus, of understanding what we want to become, and not thrust upon us by mandate. I pledge to work with you and with the new Board to effect changes that we can all feel good about.