[net.unix-wizards] Trade Secrets

lauren@Rand-Unix.ARPA (03/29/84)

It's not that simple, Rick.  It's not just a matter of whether or not
the secret "got out," but whether or not the entity controlling the
"secret" made the proper attempts to control the secret through the
appropriate legal contracts and actions.  I think that AT&T would
fall into this catagory of having done things "right," so if some
bozo simply posted sources I don't think they would suddenly become
public domain as you suggest.  On the other hand, the person who
did the posting might have some REAL problems on his or her hands.

--Lauren--

efrem@Lbl-Csam.ARPA (04/03/84)

From:  (Efrem Lipkin [DBG])efrem@Lbl-Csam.ARPA

Actually posting the source of Unix on the church door, would break
AT&T's trade secret.  If something is not secret, it is not secret.

I suggest anyone trying it have close friends in either the CIA, the
KGB, or the Mafia.

If a smaller company had released so many source copies of a program
into the world, I doubt they would be able to claim that the contents
of these programs were an effectively protected trade secret.

However, when the smoke cleared, Bell would still hold the copyright and
still own Unix.  It would be not be in the public domain and making
copies of either the source or binary would still be illegal.  The only
difference would be that you could legally show your copy of Unix to
your friends.

-- Efrem