[rec.arts.sf-lovers] here potty potty potty

weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Matthew P Wiener) (01/10/88)

Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye!  Oh never mind that sh*t, let's get this
over with.  Hit 'n' now if you've got important work to do.

Articles
<8801042134.AA07965@garnet.berkeley.edu>
<8801061146.AA04987@garnet.berkeley.edu>
<8801071134.AA05730@garnet.berkeley.edu>
are all forgeries in my name.  They all have
ihnp4!ptsfa!pyramid!amdcad!decwrl!ucbvax!GARNET.BERKELEY.EDU!weemba
as part of the path.

The first was the first potty article, the second was a flame against
Mark Ethan Smith that I haven't even bothered to read, and the third
was a retarded claim about the first potty article, and incorrect
assertions about my Uncle Marvin posting.  All 3 were crossposted to
4 or more newsgroups; so this one is scattered to them all.

Article <8801081530.AA00815@garnet.berkeley.edu>, which is genuine,
and in alt.flame only, contains my accusation that Andrew B Peed,
user ihnp4!ihlpg!apeed is both a pseudonym and the forger of
<8801042134.AA07965@garnet.berkeley.edu>, along with the earlier
news@killer (THE DICKLESS WONDER) and bitch@chinet (but twice as
absorbent!) articles: the only thread they have in common is ihnp4.
I have not seen a response to the alt.flame article from ihlpg!apeed;
instead there have been two more forgeries.

I tried to mostly ignore the problem first time around, but someone
is keeping it up; hence this article.  And I've changed my software
around a bit (on schedule too, would you believe).  Now if another
such forged article comes from the same distant site, it can only
do so by cancelling a genuine ucbvax article, or using an obviously
out-of-sequence article number.

ucbvax!garnet!weemba	Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720

apeed@ihlpg.ATT.COM (Andrew B. Peed) (01/11/88)

   Folks, I'm truly sorry about this. If I had any idea that he'd go on a
cross-posting rampage, I would'nt have posted the stupid tongue-in-cheek
article in alt.flame to begin with.

   Andy


=============================================================================
Andrew B. Peed                                        UUCP: ihnp4!ihlpg!apeed
AT&T Bell Laboratories                BITNET: moss!ihlpg!apeed at rutgers.edu
=============================================================================

firth@sei.cmu.edu (Robert Firth) (01/14/88)

If there are both a real Wiener and a mirror-image anti-Wiener wandering
about, would not the best solution be to bring them together, thereby
causing their mutual annihilation and (with any luck) the destruction
of Berkeley by the resulting blaze of radiation? :-)

weemba@GARNET.BERKELEY.EDU (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) (01/14/88)

In article <22493@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (the False Wiener) writes:
>Articles
><8801042134.AA07965@garnet.berkeley.edu>
><8801061146.AA04987@garnet.berkeley.edu>
><8801071134.AA05730@garnet.berkeley.edu>
>are all forgeries in my name.  They all have
>ihnp4!ptsfa!pyramid!amdcad!decwrl!ucbvax!GARNET.BERKELEY.EDU!weemba
>as part of the path.

Yes, and so does your mother.  In reality, article <22493@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
is the forgery, as was <8801030615.AA08864@garnet.berkeley.edu>, but that's
another story that can be verified simply by knowing that I couldn't possibly
have posted an article at the time indicated in that article number.  More on
this later only if absolutely necessary.  This is becoming tedious even for me.

>The first was the first potty article, the second was a flame against
>Mark Ethan Smith that I haven't even bothered to read, and the third
>was a retarded claim about the first potty article, and incorrect
>assertions about my Uncle Marvin posting.  All 3 were crossposted to
>4 or more newsgroups; so this one is scattered to them all.

Just like your brain is scattered to the four winds.  It was your Uncle
Marvin articles that constituted the forgeries, an effort to make it
look like I would be vain enough to post an article to the net just to
say that my uncle's name was Marvin.  How appllingly infantile.  I don't even
have an uncle named Marvin, although I did have an Uncle Martin who died many
years ago.

>Article <8801081530.AA00815@garnet.berkeley.edu>, which is genuine,

Sez you, sleazebag!

>and in alt.flame only, contains my accusation that Andrew B Peed,
>user ihnp4!ihlpg!apeed is both a pseudonym and the forger of
><8801042134.AA07965@garnet.berkeley.edu>, along with the earlier
>news@killer (THE DICKLESS WONDER) and bitch@chinet (but twice as
>absorbent!) articles: the only thread they have in common is ihnp4.

It also accuses him of being the author of the Protocol of the Elders
of Berkeley, also a forgery.  The only thread they have in common is
the single thin one that this False Wiener's verbiage hangs from.

>I have not seen a response to the alt.flame article from ihlpg!apeed;
>instead there have been two more forgeries.

No one responded to your "article" because everyone knew it was a fake.
People have responded to my articles because they can tell the real
Matthew P Wiener from a pompous snot-nosed brat-wimp who wishes he could
be Matthew P Wiener.  I leave it to the net to decide.  Who is the real
Matthew P Wiener?  Who is the Matthew P Wiener you want to see?  Me or
the wimpy little shit who shouts "forgery" the way Captain Carnage used to
shout "lawsuit" ad infinitum?  I put it to a vote.  (Followups to alt.flame,
that way there can be no question of impropriety or doctoring the ballots.) 
Who do you want to be Matthew P Wiener, the fake fraud (him) or the genuine
article (me)?  (To make the voting clearer, refer to me as Matthew and the
other jerk as Matthew' or "Matthew prime" for the uninitiated.)

>I tried to mostly ignore the problem first time around, but someone
>is keeping it up; hence this article.  And I've changed my software
>around a bit (on schedule too, would you believe).  Now if another
>such forged article comes from the same distant site, it can only
>do so by cancelling a genuine ucbvax article, or using an obviously
>out-of-sequence article number.

What this twit is trying to say here is that he knows I can trace his
whereabouts if he continued to use his old numbering scheme, emulating the
genuine Brahms Gang style, so he has deliberately switched to the
<22493@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> numbering scheme to avoid detection.  And anyone
who knows anything about me knows that I don't control netnews software at
Berkeley in the least, I don't have that authority or ability, so the claims
of my changing the software are one more clue, helping to answer the question
of who is the real Matthew P Wiener and who is the illiterate poseur twonk.

Before I forget, I apologize to Andrew B. Peed for the rash accusation made
by my "twin" here.  He isn't himself anymore.  Let's hope it stays that way.

ucbvax!garnet!weemba	The REAL Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
    "It's me," Novins said.  "How'd you enjoy your first day in my skin?"
        "How did you enjoy your first day out of it?" he replied.

vause@ncrcae.Columbia.NCR.COM (Sam Vause) (01/15/88)

Isn't it about time to halt all of this mindless drivel?

At least edit soc.motss out of the Newsgroups...

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Sam Vause, NCR Corporation, TOWER International Customer Services,|
|3325 Platt Springs Road, West Columbia, SC 29169 (803) 791-6953   |
|		...!ucbvax!sdcsvax!ncr-sd!ncrcae!cs-col!vause      |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+