betsy@dartvax.UUCP (Betsy Hanes Perry) (04/10/84)
(please, br'er Fox, don't throw me into that bramble bush!) I need help interpreting the documentation on Ar(1); we're trying to use it, and it doesn't seem to perform as expected. The problem is as follows: here at Dartmouth, we're building a large(600K) C program. It now takes approximately fifteen minutes to reMake this program, even if only one routine has been changed. At the moment, our Make includes the line: cc $(OBJECTS) to reload the object files. It occurred to us that it was wasteful to rebuild the entire object file if we were modifying only one or two routines. It seemed from the documentation that ar might be able to modify ONLY the changed objects, leaving the others intact. So we changed our Make file to read: ar ruv tempint $(OBJECTS) ranlib tempint ld -o int tempint Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to produce a usable binary. Does anybody out there have any clues as to why? (Please reply by mail if possible..) Thank you. Betsy Hanes Perry Lorien Pratt (decvax,linus,cornell)!dartvax!dartlib!(rbetsy,rlorien) -- Betsy Perry UUCP: {decvax|linus|cornell}!dartvax!betsy CSNET: betsy@dartmouth ARPA: betsy%dartmouth@csnet-relay
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) (04/11/84)
Your problem is almost certainly that ld -o int $(LIBRARY) does not include the run-time startoff nor the -X flag. Why not let "cc" do this for you: cc -o int $(LDFLAGS) ${LIBRARY}
ebk@iedl02.UUCP (04/14/84)
Creating an archive with your object files and ranlib'ing it is not really much faster than doing a cc ${OBJECTS}, since ld still needs to go through each module. If you really want to do this, though, you will need to do a bit more than just ld <archive_file>. ld only loads archive members necessary to satisfy any undefined externals. either leave your main module out of the archive and cc -o int main.o tempint or use the -u flag of ld: ld -u main -o int tempint You should almost always use cc instead of ld, since there are several switches that need to be used in the ld invocation that cc provides, which are dependent on the implementation, whether you are using a floating point simulator and/or profiling, overlays, etc. John Owens ~e
gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) (04/20/84)
If main() is in the first module in the archive, then just cc arch.a suffices to link everything, since the run-time startoff already has a reference to the extern main (_main or whatever). If the archive has a table of contents (4.?BSD or latest AT&T UNIX), then the module containing main() need not even be first in the archive.
adm@cbneb.UUCP (05/01/84)
#R:brl-vgr:-41300:cbnap:27400001:000:199 cbnap!whp Apr 26 09:27:00 1984 In addition, you don't even need to use ar! You want to recompile only those routines which were modified, then use the "$?" macro of make. Using an archive library is probably a good idea anyway.