[comp.sources.bugs] Psroff 2.0 FTP Access

clewis@ecicrl.UUCP (Chris Lewis) (11/22/90)

Archive-name: psroff2.0/FTP-ACCESS

I keep getting asked, so I thought I'd post the following anon FTP
access points for Psroff 2.0:

Psroff 2.0 patched at level 5 (alt.sources release on Nov 16):
	- ashley.cs.widener.edu (192.55.239.132) as anonymous,
	  (only between 6pm & 6am EST)
	  use your email addr for the password
	  file pub/psroff.20.pl5.tar.Z
	  Courtesy Brendan Kehoe (cs.widener.edu!brendan)
Psroff 2.0 original plus patches 1 thru 5:
	- cs.toronto.edu as anonymous,
	  file pub/psroff.tar.Z and pub/psroff.patch[1-5].Z,
	  courtesy Mark Moraes (moraes@cs.toronto.edu)
Unsure whether this is current w.r.t. patches:
	- gatekeeper.dec.com (16.1.0.2) as anonymous,
	  file /pub/misc/psroff-2.0.tar.Z,
	  courtesy Paul Vixie (vixie@wrl.dec.com)

I cannot, repeat CANNOT, honour any requests for mailing the psroff
sources directly to people.  It's too expensive for me to mail it.
You have to either get it via FTP or I would suggest posting locally
to see if anybody else has it near you.

If anybody else has psroff 2.0 set up in FTP or email accessible
archives, please let me know so that I can extend this list.
-- 
Chris Lewis, Phone: (613) 832-0541
UUCP: uunet!utai!lsuc!ecicrl!clewis
Moderator of the Ferret Mailing List (ferret-request@eci386)
Psroff mailing list (psroff-request@eci386)

tp@decwrl.dec.com (t patterson) (11/26/90)

In article <962@ecicrl.UUCP> clewis@ecicrl.UUCP (Chris Lewis) writes:
>Archive-name: psroff2.0/FTP-ACCESS
>
>I keep getting asked, so I thought I'd post the following anon FTP
>access points for Psroff 2.0:
>...
>Unsure whether this is current w.r.t. patches:
>	- gatekeeper.dec.com (16.1.0.2) as anonymous,
>	  file /pub/misc/psroff-2.0.tar.Z,
>	  courtesy Paul Vixie (vixie@wrl.dec.com)

slight correction:
	on gatekeeper.dec.com, look in pub/text/roff.

we have:
	gatekeeper 64 #ls pub/text/roff/ps*
	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.0-2.1-diffs
	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.2-2.3-diffs
	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.0.tar.Z
	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.3-2.4-diffs
	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.1-2.2-diffs
	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.4-2.5-diffs

--
t. patterson,		domain: tp@wsl.dec.com    path: decwrl!tp
DEC Western		enet:	wsl::tp
Software Lab		icbm:	122 9 41 W / 37 26 35 N
--
t  patterson		domain: tp@decwrl.dec.com    path: decwrl!tp
co-postmaster		enet:	decwrl::tp
			icbm:	122 9 41 W / 37 26 35 N

clewis@ecicrl.UUCP (Chris Lewis) (11/29/90)

In article <1990Nov26.011738.17108@wrl.dec.com> tp@decwrl.dec.com (t patterson) writes:
|slight correction:
|	on gatekeeper.dec.com, look in pub/text/roff.
|
|we have:
|	gatekeeper 64 #ls pub/text/roff/ps*
|	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.0-2.1-diffs
|	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.2-2.3-diffs
|	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.0.tar.Z
|	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.3-2.4-diffs
|	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.1-2.2-diffs
|	pub/text/roff/psroff-2.4-2.5-diffs

What a bizarre way of naming patches!  Why not psroff-2.0-p01 or something?
Then I don't have to list each file separately in my ftp notice.
And no, Psroff 2.0 patch level 1 is not 2.1.  My numbering scheme doesn't
work that way.  You'll have trouble when I come out with a real 2.1 release.
-- 
Chris Lewis, Phone: (613) 832-0541
UUCP: uunet!utai!lsuc!ecicrl!clewis
Moderator of the Ferret Mailing List (ferret-request@eci386)
Psroff mailing list (psroff-request@eci386)