david@dhw68k.cts.com (David H. Wolfskill) (05/26/89)
In article <249@vector.Dallas.TX.US> chip@vector.Dallas.TX.US (Chip Rosenthal) writes: >Just stumbled upon a conflict in site names -- there is a "chief" in tx >and one in ca. There are probably a bunch more of these. Well, checking u.usa.ca.* and u.usa.tx.*, I find a real map entry for a site named "chief" in u.usa.ca.1, with (unfortunately) no #W line (so I have no idea when the entry was written). I also find that in u.usa.tx.3, site woton is claiming a DIRECT link to a site named "chief" -- which is, presumably, the same site. If that does not, in fact, correspond to the reality that the S/A at woton intends, perhaps a map update for woton is in order.... david -- David H. Wolfskill uucp: ...{spsd,zardoz,felix}!dhw68k!david InterNet: david@dhw68k.cts.com
lance@hermix.UUCP (Lance Ellinghouse) (05/31/89)
To clarify everything I decided to post here instead of sending lots of little messages all over the place. chief in TX gave up the systems name chief to the chief in CA about 1 - 1.5 years ago. I am the Sysadmin for chief in CA. I did not relize that I had not included a #W line. Sorry. I will update it when I get a chance. I don't know why it still shows up in TX. Lance Ellinghouse -- Lance Ellinghouse Mark V Systems, Ltd. UUCP: ...!hermix!lance ARPA: ucla-an!hermix!lance@ee.UCLA.EDU