[comp.mail.misc] Unreplyable addresses not considered illegal enough?

bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) (03/11/91)

By an unreplyable address, I mean an address to which mail cannot be
sent, but which is found in the From: or Reply-To: header line of a
mail or news message.  Common and obvious examples are simply
malformed non-addresses (e.g. joe@undotted-name or site!joe or
joe%site); but more subtle ones include well-formed addresses that are
continually inaccessible, such as those for which valid MX records are
available but which direct the SMTP socket toward an un"connected"
network (e.g. pentagon-ai.army.mil).

The only explicit reference I can find to unreplyable From: lines is
in RFC1123, section 5.3.7(D) of the discussion of gatewaying between
the Internet and other mail systems, where we find that `... all
addresses ... must be effective and useful for sending replies.'
(Note that 5.3.7 discusses mail that crosses mail network boundaries,
but not Internet-only mail!)

This is at least a bit more explicit than RFC822, section 4.4.1 of the
discussion of the From: field, where we see that `... addresses in the
"From" field must be machine-usable (addr-specs) ...'  One might
broadly interpret "machine-usable" to mean "accessible via SMTP and
the DNS", but that seems to be stretching the interpretation a bit
further than most Talmudic scholars of the RFCs would prefer.

I think that most mail users and administrators would agree that
unreplyable From: or Reply-To: lines are Wrong.  Why is there no
stronger and more specific prohibition?

tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) (03/11/91)

In article <BOB.91Mar10163331@volitans.MorningStar.Com> bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
>I think that most mail users and administrators would agree that
>unreplyable From: or Reply-To: lines are Wrong.  Why is there no
>stronger and more specific prohibition?

It seems impracticable to burden every forwarding agent with the
responsibility of verifying origination headers.  The locus of
prohibition should be the sender's site, where verification is
inexpensive and sanctions are immediate and least-disruptive.

Let us see a rundown of the most common kinds of unreplyable origination
header, along with where they come from and what causes them.  Then the
right thing to do will suggest itself.