gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore) (06/23/87)
Brandon Allbery writes: > I don't think anyone has to worry about throughput. If comp.sources.misc > were a fully moderated newsgroup then there would be cause for worry, but > as it is there are too many alternate arrangements possible for it to be > a problem. I thought comp.sources.misc was being converted to an *unmoderated* group. I heard this as a rumor from the backbone meeting at Usenix and saw it on the net as well. What's the holdup? It should be as simple as posting a newgroup message marking it unmoderated, and fixing it in the checkgroups list. -- {sun,ptsfa,lll-crg,ihnp4,ucbvax}!hoptoad!gnu gnu@ingres.berkeley.edu Kudos to Stargate for permitting redistribution. May the Source be with you!