[news.groups] Conclusion of balloting for comp.binaries.apple2

lwv@n8emr.UUCP (Larry W. Virden) (01/07/88)

At the conclusion of balloting, we had the following tallys:

totals: 77 unqualified yes, 5 qualified yes, and 1 no votes.


Other:

1.      comp.binaries.apple2

From: chemabs!sun!portal!cup.portal.com!dick_a_wotiz
	Here's another YES vote for comp.binaries.apple2.

From: chemabs!chemabs!osu-cis!motcoh!mcdchg!nud!xroads!cc
	Dan McGuirk
	I would like to vote YES on the comp.binaries.apple2 newsgroup.

From: chemabs!ihnp4!convex!paulk (Paul Kalapathy)
	-Paul Kalapathy         convex!paulk
	Here's my vote for comp.binaries.apple2.

From: Brian Dall <chemabs!NU092254@NDSUVM1.ARPA>
        (note:  Although comp.sys.apple is ok, I think, in order to prevent
        confusion comp.binaries.apple2 would be better than
        comp.binaries.apple.  After all, we don't want Macintosh programs
        posted/cross posted to this new newsgroup if it is granted.)

2.      Conditionals
From: "ETD1::LABOVITZ" <ucbvax!afwal-aaa.arpa!labovitz%etd1.decnet>
	Lt Stu Labovitz        arpa:   Labovitz%etd1.decnet@Afwal-aaa.ARPA
	I vote 'YES', conditional upon this news group being Arpanet/Milnet
	accessable.

Yes:

From: chemabs!larryV
	Larry W. Virden                 UUCP:   cbosgd!osu-cis!chemabs!larryV

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!isl.stanford.edu!psuvax1!trott (Mitchell Trott)

From: CKCU <ucbvax!jade.berkeley.edu!WCSCKCU%CARLETON.BITNET>

From: chemabs!paula@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM (Paula Matuszek)

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!hao!stcvax!snr
	Stan Roberts

From: Matthias Kapffer <ucbvax!WISCVM.WISC.EDU!MAT6013%DMZRZU71.BITNET>
	Matthias Kapffer
	<MAT6013@DMZRZU71.BITNET>
        I  clearly  vote  for YES (and of course a linkage to APPLE2-L) to
        make public domain software accessible to everyone.

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!ub.cc.umich.edu!tabakal_umaug
	Todd A. Bakal
	Tabakal@ub.cc.umich.edu

From: Ois projects <chemabs!oisproj@db.toronto.edu>

From: Brian A. LaMacchia <ucbvax!ATHENA.MIT.EDU!balamac>
	--Brian LaMacchia
	  balamac@athena.mit.edu

	Note that Brian, in a separate message, asked for
	comp.sources.apple - lwv

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!tzone.ceo.dg.com!dave_kopper

From: Dipto Chakravarty (UNIX Consultant <dipto>

From: ucbvax!cs.Buffalo.EDU!ugcullen (Peter Cullen)

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!umn-cs!altura:everhart (William Everhart)

From: chemabs!cs211s40@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Taro Nobusawa)

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!im4u!esc-bb!halley!rrt

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!umn-cs!altura:gossman (Mitch Gossman)

From: sun!pixar!mp (Mike Paquette)
        I'm all in favor of it.  Considering the enormous amount of traffic
        that has resulted from the (unreachable) APPLE-2L service, I'd say
        that there is a good amount of interest.


From: "Toerless Eckert" (hiwi) <hpfcla!hpda!uunet!unido!faui10!eckert@hp-lsd.UUCP>
	Toerless Eckert

From: jeffj@pnet01.cts.com (Jeff Jungblut)

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!uwvax!geowhiz!scott
	Scott Kempf
	UUCP:   {seismo, topaz, harvard, ihnp4}!uwvax!geowhiz!scott

From: DAVE LYONS <dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!uiamvs.RUTGERS.EDU!AWCTTYPA>
	--Dave Lyons      AWCTTYPA@UIAMVS (bitnet)

From: Jeffrey Alan Ding <dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!neighbor>
	neighbor@csd4.milw.wisc.edu

From: dkstar!rebel!gatech!rutgers!gatech!tektronix!reed!douglas (P Douglas Reeder)
	Doug Reeder                      USENET: ...!tektronix!reed!douglas

From: chemabs!pnet01!pro-pac!tsouth@bass.nosc.mil (Todd South)
	-=--=-   uucp: crash!pnet01!pro-mars!pro-simasd!pro-pac!tsouth    -=--=
        Well Pat Haring has asked me to vote on the new user group, and I
        certainly WOULD like to see it.  But, I would like to also see some
        EXPLANATIONS about what these user groups entail for the people out
        here that receive the info-apple-req newsfeeds.  How will it work if
        it is incorporated into the system?  What will it do for that matter?
        Will we still have to push text'd up programs across the circuits or
        will so other form of file packing evolve?  So you got another YES
        VOTE!  Thanks for any info.


From: chemabs!mkao@crash.cts.com (Mike Kao)

From: chemabs!larry@sgistl.SGI.COM (Larry Autry)
	larry@sgistl.sgi.com

From: ihnp4!gargoyle!oddjob!uwvax!uwmacc!uwmcsd1!lakesys!james (James Gehrke)
	| UUCP:  {ihnp4,uwvax}!uwmcsd1!lakesys!james  |

From: ihnp4!gargoyle!oddjob!hao.UCAR.EDU!NOAO!arizona!caset!catuc!doug

From: ucbvax!pyr.gatech.edu!iadt3tb (T. Terrell Banks)
	T. Terrell Banks  uucp: ...!{akgua,ihnp4,hplabs,seismo}!gatech!gitpyr!iadt3tb

From: chemabs!cmcl2!cooper.cooper.EDU!c.steinb (Craig Steinberger)
	Craig Steinberger c.steinb@cooper.edu

From: Tak Ariga <utgpu!tak>
	--Tak Ariga     tak@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu

From: sun!zehntel!bill (Bill Ellis)

From: chemabs!walter@vub.vub.UUCP (Walter Sonck)

From: chemabs!ames!gatech!rutgers!umn-cs!altura:chu (King Hang Chu)

From: chemabs!tektronix!psu-cs!psueea!parsely!kegan (Ron Whittle)
	Ron Whittle                                        Everyone is a book of blood;
	My vote:   YES!!!!
	Also, how about a comp.sources.apple?

From: chemabs!ihnp4!think!harvard!husc8!nakada (Paul Nakada)

From: <chemabs!ames!gatech!rutgers!hao!stcvax!cls>
	Chuck Still        UUCP:    {hao ihnp4 decvax}!stcvax!cls

From: Peter Godwin <chemabs!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx.UChicago.EDU!sphinx!god3>
	Peter Godwin                   |      ...ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!god3

From: hp-pcd!cmcl2!harvard!think!whitney@hp-lsd.UUCP@winfree.UUCP ( at winfree.n3eua.ampr)
	David Whitney, MIT '90                     Still learning about my Apple //GS
	{the known universe}!ihnp4!think!whitney   and all of its secrets. Any and all

From: Hal Birkeland <chemabs!garp!mit-amt!hkbirke@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>
	-- hal  hkbirke@media-lab.media.mit.edu

From: cbosgd!osu-cis!osupyr!artsvax!wilhoit@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU  (Van Theip)
        Yes. By all means. comp.binaries.apple _and_ comp.sources.apple.  I'm
        shocked there aren't such already.  They would be _busy_.  Do it.
        Please.

From: ucbvax!sandia.Berkeley.EDU!marms
	Mike Arms uucp:  ...{ucbvax | gatech}!unmvax!sandia!marms

        Here's my YES vote for creation of the newsgroup
        "comp.binaries.apple".  I would very much prefer that it be a
        moderated group. One very good reason for this is to act as a flow
        controller. The moderator of "comp.binaries.mac" receives many
        multipart programs for posting. He does not flood releases all at
        once. Rather he spreads the load out over several days. One positive
        result of this is to lower somewhat the visibility and load that the
        group represents to the net. It is important to keep this in mind as
        we don't want to lose our new group due to irritation of the
        Backbone. I want this group to succeed. Thanks for the work.

        PS. I am having a very hard time getting mail to you. So far I have
        had mail to you returned several times. I am trying to send this via
        several paths. Hope one gets through.


From: trotter!gray.ee.usma.edu!hayne@hp-lsd.UUCP (CPT Ron Hayne)
	Ronald J. Hayne CPT ADA D/EE USMA (phri!trotter!gray!hayne)

From: chemabs!ihnp4!decwrl!mips!wje (Bill Earl)
	William J. Earl			wje@mips.com

From: chemabs!ames!pur-ee!palermo (Dan Palermo)

From: tektronix!reed!kamath (Sean Kamath)
	UUCP:  {decvax allegra ucbcad ucbvax hplabs ihnp4}!tektronix!reed!kamath
        I would just like to say that, in the event that the group is formed,
        to start things off it would be nice to post (in moderation)
        everything on the BROWNVM archives, as I can't get them off the
        server. . .:-)

From: Ken Faubel <chemabs!apollo!faubel>
    The newsgroup comp.sys.apple is attempting to spin off a
    comp.binaries.apple group for posting of PD apple ][ programs.  If you
    have *any* interest in this (even if you don't read news, I'll be
    collecting them anyway), please send a message to lwv@n8emr.UUCP saying
    simply that you vote YES for comp.binaries.apple.

From: <chemabs!ames!im4u!ti-csl!tilde!gjordan>
	George Jordan (gjordan@tilde.UUCP)

From: inmet!knowles@hp-lsd.UUCP (Richard J. Knowles)
	Dick Knowles            Intermetrics
        Though I just read a reponse wondering if comp.binaries.apple would
        be restricted to EXECable only.  I vote yes for all sources and
        binaries, whether they be EXEC, BASIC, C or anything else.

From: chemabs!apollo!ed
           Ed Bailey

From: chemabs!apollo!nab

From: chemabs!chemabs!bkr27 (Keith Rose)

From: ihnp4!ihlpm!mnhou
	Mark N. Hougaard

From: chemabs!apollo!elbers_e

From: chemabs!likewise!ccnysci!jeffrey (Jeffrey Bromberger)

From: chemabs!apollo!eldred

From: Kee Hinckley <chemabs!apollo!nazgul>

From: Rex_Burton <ucbvax!silver.bacs.indiana.edu!burton>
	Rex Burton@silver.bacs.indiana.edu

From: chemabs!ames!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!saponara (John Saponara)
	John Saponara
	YES - I'm all for comp.binaries.apple.  Atari has one - why not us?

	lwv - I also received a second vote with this message:

	Larry,
		I'm about 95% sure you received my vote.  Just to cut off that 5% of
	insecurity, here is my vote again: I vote yes for Apple binaries.

	John Saponara (actually, Eric Haines, using his account - I forget who's name
	we voted under).


From: ucbvax!jade.berkeley.edu!SEWALL%UCONNVM.bitnet
	ARPA:   sewall%uconnvm.bitnet@wiscvm.wisc.edu       Murphy A. Sewall

        I vote for comp.binaries.apple even though until the technology
        catches up (I've seen some skuttlebutt that "ftp" will eventually
        come to bitnet), I won't be able to get anything from it unless it
        sends stuff in hex to APPLE2-L.

        I assume somehow the two lists will be linked.  Anyhow, it's more
        than a little evident that APPLE2-L isn't very helpful to many,
        perhaps most, Apple ][ users not on bitnet, netnorth, or earn.


From: Ted Medin <ucbvax!SHARK.NOSC.MIL!MEDIN-T>
	I vote yes for comp.apple.binaries. Could we also include source?

From: ihnp4!ucf-cs!unf5!layne
	Layne Wallace                           decvax!ucf-cs!unf5!lwallace (uucp)

From: "William J. Gilbert" <ihnp4!watmath!wjgilbert>

From: Paul Blumstein <hplabs!hp-sdd!sdsu!ttidca.TTI.COM!paulb@hp-lsd.UUCP>
	Paul Blumstein;Citicorp/TTI| Everyone is a 10 in some base numbering system.

From: gray.ee.usma.edu!bowman@trotter (CPT Doug Bowman)
	CPT Doug Bowman D/EE USMA (phri!trotter!gray!bowman)
	Yes for the creation of the group.
	As an aside. I am the system administrator for 3 UNIX systems and the
	apple binaries would fit well with the Mac, IBM, etc that come over the
	net. It is about time that we get equal time!

From: William C. DenBesten<bgsuvax!denbeste>
	William C. DenBesten | CSNET denbeste@research1.bgsu.edu
	YES, this group sounds promising.  I would also suggest either
	a) also creating a comp.sources.apple group, or
	b) encouraging sources to be posted to comp.binaries.apple.
	This way, the traffic in comp.sys.apple can be further reduced.

From: Rob Clive - 237 <likewise!uunet!mcvax!lucifer!rob>
	I vote YES because I haven't had any luck getting through to Apple2-l.  If
	there was an easy way of getting through and getting a reliable reply then
	the vote would possibly be no.

From: ihnp4!laidbak!spl1!raj (Robert Alan Johnson)
	I VOTE A MOST EMPHATIC YES FOR comp.binaries.apple

From: ucbvax!sdcsvax!pnet01.cts.com!mkao (Mike Kao)
	UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!mkao

From: ucbvax!sdcsvax!pnet01.cts.com!danr (Dan Rubesh)
	UUCP: {cbosgd, hplabs!hp-sdd, sdcsvax, nosc}!crash!pnet01!danr

From: ulysses!umix!ub.cc.umich.edu!Tabakal_UMAUG
	Larry, affirmative vote for Comp.Binaries.Apple, Comp.Sources.Apple,
	or whatever it will be called.

From: chemabs!hoptoad!dasys1!patth (Patt Haring)
	Patt Haring                       UUCP:    ..cmcl2!phri!dasys1!patth
	I vote yes for comp.binaries.apple
	or
		       comp.binaries.apple2

From: chemabs!ganzer@trout.nosc.mil (Mark T. Ganzer)
	MarK T. Ganzer  Naval Ocean Systems Center

From: chemabs!tysko@pdp.cs.OHIOU.EDU
	John Tysko  ...cbosgd!oucs!tysko

From: Brint Cooper <ucbvax!BRL.ARPA!abc>
        What about Apple software sources?  Is it intended that programs in
        C, Assembler, BASIC, PASCAL, LOGO, and whatever be posted to
        comp.binaries.apple or would the group be restricted only to
        EXEC-able hex files.

        If it's restricted, perhaps we should have a companion
        comp.sources.apple?

From: chemabs!altura:shankar (Subash Shankar)
	Subash Shankar          Honeywell Systems & Research Center

>From gwspc!cbosgd!ptsfa!pbhyd!lc  Fri Nov 13 15:22:38 1987 remote from cbcsta
	Larry Colton                      {ihnp4,pyramid,qantel}!ptsfa!pbhyd!lc

No:
From: Jeff Forys <chemabs!sigi!forys@BOULDER.COLORADO.EDU>
	Assuming there is a wealth of public domain software out there for
	Apples, someone must have written a comple compliers for them!
	I would cerainly vote for a moderated, source group (although I own
	no Apple), but *not* an unmoderated binary group.

-- 
Larry W. Virden	 75046,606 (CIS)
674 Falls Place, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (614) 864-8817
cbosgd!n8emr!lwv (UUCP) 	cbosgd!n8emr!lwv@PSUVAX1 (BITNET)
We haven't inherited the world from our parents, but borrowed it from our children.