[news.groups] Comments on Hypercard binaries vote

sysop@stech.UUCP (Jan Harrington) (03/10/88)

As the vote taker for the proposed comp.binaries.hypercard group, I thought
it was better if I stayed out of the discussion about the group.  However,
there has been a great deal of "negative campaigning" by people against the
group, so I've reconsidered my position.

As you can see from the previous posting with the vote upgrade in it, the
vote is, at this time, quite close (remember that it takes 100 more yes
votes than no votes to create a new group).  A lot of no votes have come
in recently, compared to very few yes votes.  I think this is because the
no votes are martialing their forces ...

If you are one of those who is in favor of the group, but hasn't voted 
because you thought the issue was settled, please mail in your vote.  We
need every yes vote we can get at this point.                     

I will continue to accept all votes are sent from your system through
Wednesday, March 16 (that, I believe, is one month after the voting began).
Since I will be out of town on the 16th and 17th (in NYC to see Phantom
of the Opera!), I'll post the final tally on the 18th, after I get back.

If you are looking for the fastest mail path to me - choose the path
through allegra.  Though the path to amcad is fast, amcad often has
trouble getting through to husc6.  husc6, at Harvard, is a very busy
machine...


Jan Harrington, sysop
Scholastech Telecommunications
UUCP: ihnp4!husc6!amcad!stech!sysop or allegra!stech!sysop
BITNET: JHARRY@BENTLEY

********************************************************************************
	Miscellaneous profundity:

		"No matter where you go, there you are."
				Buckaroo Banzai
********************************************************************************