mangoe@mimsy.UUCP (Charley Wingate) (05/19/88)
>> As I said before, with the inclusion of C/PM on the C128 that >>has opened up more areas where Commodore users can get software >>support. So you cannot simply consider the programs written >>specifically for Commodore computers. >Who actually uses the 128's CP/M mode? There is actually a fair amount of traffic in ~.cpm on the C128, and the simtel-20 archives do store programs for these machines. I don't think there is a need to create a new group to handle this traffic. C. Wingate
dennisf@marque.mu.edu (Dennis Flaherty) (05/20/88)
In article <11577@mimsy.UUCP> mangoe@mimsy.umd.edu.UUCP (Charley Wingate) writes: } >> As I said before, with the inclusion of C/PM on the C128 that } >>has opened up more areas where Commodore users can get software } >>support. So you cannot simply consider the programs written } >>specifically for Commodore computers. } } >Who actually uses the 128's CP/M mode? me! } } There is actually a fair amount of traffic in ~.cpm on the C128, and the } simtel-20 archives do store programs for these machines. I don't think } there is a need to create a new group to handle this traffic. I'll agree with you there-- we are supported by simtel-20/rpicicge for C128's CPM mode. There is no need for a usenet group for that. But what about C128 native mode and the C64, the proposal in question? Dennis -- Dennis Flaherty dennisf%marque@csd1.milw.wisc.edu Marquette University 3790FLAH@MUCSD.BITNET USNail: 826 N. 20th St. dennisf@marque.mu.edu Milwaukee, WI 53233