smith@ncoast.UUCP (06/04/88)
> Article <11803@ut-sally.UUCP> From: nather@ut-sally.UUCP (Ed Nather) > In article <3186@bsu-cs.UUCP>, dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes: > > > > Better still, we need comp.sources.msdos. Why doesn't somebody propose > > it? The net population likes sources, so it should have no trouble > > getting approved, and it might even encourage more source postings. > > -- > > I second the motion. Before the Great Net Reorganization we had a group > for MS-DOS sources which was extremely popular -- some chaff, but a fair > amount of wheat, too. Now MS-DOS sources are posted to a lot of different > newsgroups, many that are inappropriate, or are not posted at all. > Discussions of this nature belong in news.groups according to the guidelines put out by Spaf. -- decvax!mandrill!ncoast!smith ncoast!smith@cwru.csnet (ncoast!smith%cwru.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA)