richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) (10/19/89)
In article <47105@bbn.COM> mesard@BBN.COM (Wayne Mesard) writes: > >Enough sed(1)? It's for exactly this reason that I voted against the >group: I agree that there's a propagation problem outside of na. But >for Christ's sake, let's address that issue directly instead of >continually polluting the Beloved Namespace. So we have sci.chem, sci.physics and sci.math and the rest get moved to misc, right ? Or do we allow a few technical groups than aren't *pure science* in sci ? -- Help wipe out BBQ lighter fluid in your lifetime richard@gryphon.COM decwrl!gryphon!richard gryphon!richard@elroy.jpl.NASA.GOV