jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) (10/13/89)
It was suggested that the best place for data on aquaria is
in scientific journals. As has been suggested before, if
one is interested in that elevated a level of discussion,
(1) create sci.bio.aquatic (or sci.oceanography, or oceanology)
or
(2) let the zealots keep alt.aquaria while the dilettantes
create rec.aquaria.
Tanks to all,
Jeff
Just an aside: what do you call hordes of people forming
partnerships?
Teaming multitudes!
--
My vocabulary can beat up your vocabulary.oleg@gryphon.COM (Oleg Kiselev) (10/22/89)
In article <6525@ficc.uu.net> jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) writes: >(1) create sci.bio.aquatic (or sci.oceanography, or oceanology) How does either of those groups address fresh water biotopes? And how does oceanography relate to setting up a working marine ecology in a finite and limited space? >(2) let the zealots keep alt.aquaria while the dilettantes > create rec.aquaria. Wait till the end of the current vote and propose rec.aquaria once the results are known. -- "No regrets, no apologies" Ronald Reagan Oleg Kiselev ARPA: lcc.oleg@seas.ucla.edu, oleg@gryphon.COM (213)337-5230 UUCP: [world]!{ucla-se|gryphon}!lcc!oleg