chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) (10/24/89)
Anyone else interested in a group dedicated towards research into ways of combatting parasite problems in uncooked fish? Since sci.aquaria is a research oriented group, it's obvious that this should be a subgroup of it. -- Chuq Von Rospach <+> Editor,OtherRealms <+> Member SFWA/ASFA chuq@apple.com <+> CI$: 73317,635 <+> [This is myself speaking] Trust Mama Nature to remind us just how important things like sci.aquaria's name really is in the scheme of things.
csg@pyramid.pyramid.com (Carl S. Gutekunst) (10/25/89)
In article <35852@apple.Apple.COM> chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes: >Anyone else interested in a group dedicated towards research into ways of >combatting parasite problems in uncooked fish? Since sci.aquaria is a >research oriented group, it's obvious that this should be a subgroup of it. Actually, the discussion worked reasonably well in alt.aquaria, crossposted to alt.fishing. (There was some confusion and ill-informed flaming because of some confusion over the distinction between dolphin fish and the marine mammal of the same name, but that's incidental.) Based on that experience, I'd say there is no demonstrated need for a separate group. <csg>
richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) (10/26/89)
In article <35852@apple.Apple.COM> chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes: >Anyone else interested in a group dedicated towards research into ways of >combatting parasite problems in uncooked fish? Since sci.aquaria is a >research oriented group, it's obvious that this should be a subgroup of it. We already discussed that. Would you like me to mail you that series of postings and the conclusions we reached ? Would you like me to have RDC run them through banner, first ? You know Chuq, you aren't as good at these inflamatory postings as GWS is. Maybe you could take lessons or something. -- ``They care more about the name than the content? Amazing.'' - Mark R. Horton richard@gryphon.COM decwrl!gryphon!richard gryphon!richard@elroy.jpl.NASA.GOV