scott@nastar.UUCP (Scott Barman) (11/01/89)
In article <21256@terminus.UUCP> nyssa@terminus.UUCP (The Prime Minister) writes: >I suspect several votes failed to arrive due to confusion about the >address. Between the call for discussion and the call for votes, the >machine I am on was dropped by a major feed, which also removed us from >a domain. This leads me to recommend that future votes have mailboxes >established at a known site (uunet, perhaps?) which forwards votes to >the appropriate vote counter. If this is the case, then maybe we should give it another chance? I would volunteer this machine for the vote (we are connected to gatech and is a very reliable site) but we are having disk problems.... If we can wait a few weeks.... However, if the net.sticklers do not want to just re-vote with mail problems solved, then why don't we re-introduce it for discussion, etc. (i.e. whatever the now accepted procedure is). Eventhough I voted for the split of both newsgroups, I have no problems with the way it is now. However, I would hate to see a vote fail because of email problems. -- scott barman {gatech, emory}!nastar!scott <-- please note new address