hb@uvaarpa.virginia.edu (Hank Bovis) (11/14/89)
Chuq, really, I think you are making this unnecessarily difficult... In article <36404@apple.Apple.COM> chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes: >That sci.aquaria was voted in ... >doesn't say anything about whether rec.aquaria would have been better or >worse. We won't know that until we ask the net, and Richard has successfully >handled the situation so that can't be done. Of course if can be done. Consider that alt is the ultimate anarchy. So if the purpose of Richard's vote was to "move" alt.aquaria, which as I understand it, he created, then presumably he will now remove it in favor of the sci group. Now you or anyone else can recreate alt.aquaria as you want it and thn conduct a vote to "move" that group to rec.aquaria or rec.pets.aquarium or whatever, just as Richard did. If both groups exist, then which is "better" will ultimately be determined by the sort of articles that people post in the two groups. People can then "vote" by where and what they post. Why do you think "that can't be done"? hb -- Hank Bovis (hb@Virginia.EDU, hb@Virginia.BITNET)