[news.groups] Newsgroup selection as personal prejudice

chip@ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg) (11/21/89)

According to maslak@unix.SRI.COM (Valerie Maslak):
>According to chip@ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg):
>>[Valerie's point about sysadmin job descriptions] is irrelevant.
>>Job descriptions are often vague and general.  A simple phrase such as
>>"maintain electronic communications" covers newsgroup selection.
>
>Does it indeed, if what we're talking about is really one person
>inflicting his or her personal prejudices on an entire workspace?

Yes.  A sysadmin's responsibilities always include value judgements.  A good
sysadmin will consider the values of the users in addition to his or her
own, but at some point someone must make a decision as to what is a
worthwhile use of university or company resources.

For example, ateng doesn't carry soc.men, soc.singles or soc.women.  Why?
Because, in my opinion, their volume is too high for the (non-)good they do.

On the other hand, in my opinion, talk.bizarre is good for comic relief and
the occasional mind-bending article from mr x or Bill Bill.  Other admins
are prejudiced against bizarreness.  That's their opinion.  No big deal.

>No, at some point, what you're talking about is really a form of
>censorship based on personal prejudice [...]

You know a Usenet discussion has gone on too long when someone:

    1.  Brings up Hitler and the Nazis.
    2.  Reminds us all that Usenet is an anarchy.
    3.  Calls newsgroup selection "censorship".

-- 
You may redistribute this article only to those who may freely do likewise.
Chip Salzenberg at A T Engineering;  <chip@ateng.com> or <uunet!ateng!chip>
    "Did I ever tell you the Jim Gladding story about the binoculars?"