jeffd@ficc.uu.net (Jeff Daiell) (11/28/89)
In article <4763@nigel.udel.EDU>, berryh@udel.edu (John Berryhill) writes: > > Why is Peter Da Silva conducting a vote on a group that already exists? > [other questions deleted] > > Does Peter Da Saliva have a mind at all? John, Peter's vote (and my survey on motives involved in the original con.aquaria balloting) is a reaction to a group creation process that was, at best, suspect (were the votes ever confirmed?). So his action is not unsporting, but rational. And Peter has a very good mind. It just needs some guidance occasionally when it comes to economics! {|8^)] Jeff Daiell