chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) (12/20/89)
alien@cpoint.UUCP (Alien Wells) writes: >It won't be over until rec.aquaria is created. I don't care if it is a >renamed sci.aquaria or a new group. If Peter's vote is NOT used to create >rec.aquaria The newgroup for rec.aquaria went out today. Spaf will be listing it in the next list of official groups (I was waiting to find out whether he was going to do that). It's considered a new group, since sci.aquaria will also be listed. So now, can we go argue about something important? Better yet, can we be quiet for a while? I've got one: why don't we start a discussion about rmgrouping news.groups. Seems to me 95% of the postings in news.groups are worthless. We could likely do without it completely and do just as well as far as creating groups are concerned. There's very little discussion and a lot of noise. -- Chuq Von Rospach <+> chuq@apple.com <+> [This is myself speaking] For herein may be seen noble chivalry, courtesy, humanity, friendliness, cowardice, murder, hate, virtue and sin. Do after the good and leave the evil, and it shall bring you to good fame and renown. -- Malory