jtc@van-bc.UUCP (J.T. Conklin) (12/22/89)
It has come to my attention that the Reply-To: header of the
comp.software.misc was munged up.
If you've sent a vote, and it bounced, please send it again to
one of the addresses listed below:
DNS: jtc@wimsey.bc.ca
UUCP: ...!{uunet, ubc-cs}!van-bc!jtc
Sorry about the screw up,
--jtc
--
J.T. Conklin
...!{uunet,ubc-cs}!van-bc!jtc, jtc@wimsey.bc.cadww@stl.stc.co.uk (David Wright) (12/24/89)
In article <109@van-bc.UUCP> jtc@van-bc.UUCP (J.T. Conklin) writes:
#It has come to my attention that the Reply-To: header of the
#comp.software.misc was munged up.
#
#If you've sent a vote, and it bounced, please send it again to
#one of the addresses listed below:
#
# DNS: jtc@wimsey.bc.ca
# UUCP: ...!{uunet, ubc-cs}!van-bc!jtc
The Reply-to: was OK in the version I saw - but the address doesn't work!
See the following lines from the 'bounce' I got when I voted.
Note: mcsun.eu.net is now on the Internet, so has access to the internet
name servers - though it's possible that it's been talking to one with
out of date tables which nevertheless claims to be 'authentic'.
===============
Received: by mcsun.EU.net via EUnet; Sat, 23 Dec 89 23:33:03 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 89 23:33:03 +0100
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@mcsun.eu.net>
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 wimsy.bc.ca!jtc... 550 Host unknown (Authoritative answer from name server)
----- Unsent message follows -----
From: David Wright <dww@stl.stc.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 89 22:21:25 GMT
To: jtc@wimsy.bc.ca
...
===============
Meanwhile, I'll try again, this time to van-bc.UUCP - according to our
local tables van-bc is a "known site".
Regards, "None shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity"
David Wright STL, London Road, Harlow, Essex CM17 9NA, UK
dww@stl.stc.co.uk <or> ...uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!dww <or> PSI%234237100122::DWWjtc@seac.UUCP (J.T. Conklin) (12/25/89)
[ Sorry if you've seen this post before, the first time it went out, it was hopelessly munged up. I've canceled the offending article and am trying a second time. ] In article <2590@stl.stc.co.uk> "David Wright" <dww@stl.stc.co.uk> writes: >In article <109@van-bc.UUCP> jtc@van-bc.UUCP (J.T. Conklin) writes: >#It has come to my attention that the Reply-To: header of the >#comp.software.misc was munged up. ># >#If you've sent a vote, and it bounced, please send it again to >#one of the addresses listed below: ># ># DNS: jtc@wimsey.bc.ca ># UUCP: ...!{uunet, ubc-cs}!van-bc!jtc > >The Reply-to: was OK in the version I saw - but the address doesn't work! >See the following lines from the 'bounce' I got when I voted. Thats what I meant -- I misspelled "wimsey.bc.ca" as "wimsy.bc.ca" I've been shuffling between unfamiliar machines to post and read news ever since mine (tessera) died. News on wimsey/van-bc isn't set up to put its Internet address in the Reply-To: header; so I thought I'd put it in myself. Unfortunatly, I misspelled the address. --jtc -- J.T. Conklin jtc@wimsey.bc.ca, ...!{uunet, ubc-cs}!van-bc!jtc