tale@cs.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) (12/28/89)
In article <507@sci34hub.UUCP> gary@sci34hub.UUCP (Gary Heston) goes
on a bit of an excursion from the Pink Floyd group argument into a
paragraph which complains mightily about some .signature tom-foolery
perpetuated by Thom Rounds. A rather odd flame of this appears under
the original subject in alt.flame.
I am here reposting a somewhat milder version of the question I would
sincerely like answered. Why do people quote .signatures in follow-
ups when they are not making any comment regarding them? I honestly
do not see the point. Thanks to those who provide some insight into
this phenomenon.
Dave
--
(setq mail '("tale@cs.rpi.edu" "tale@ai.mit.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))