[news.groups] comp.sys.cisco

haas@cs.utah.edu (Walt Haas) (01/12/90)

I'm in favor of this newsgroup.  I was on the mailing list for a long time,
then when we started to forward the list to a local newsgroup (called
fa.cisco on our host) I switched to that for convenience.

Walt Haas    haas@cs.utah.edu    utah-cs!haas

karl@ficc.uu.net (Karl Lehenbauer) (01/15/90)

In article <1990Jan11.214207.24382@hellgate.utah.edu> haas@cs.utah.edu (Walt Haas) writes:
>I'm in favor of this newsgroup.  I was on the mailing list for a long time,
>then when we started to forward the list to a local newsgroup (called
>fa.cisco on our host) I switched to that for convenience.

But shouldn't it go in the "biz" hierarchy?
-- 
-- uunet!ficc!karl "...as long as there is a Legion of super-Heroes, 
		       all else can surely be made right."   -- Sensor Girl

tli@phakt.usc.edu (Tony Li) (01/16/90)

In article <BY21269xds12@ficc.uu.net> karl@ficc.uu.net (Karl Lehenbauer) writes:
    
    But shouldn't it go in the "biz" hierarchy?

No, not at all.  It's a users group similar to comp.sys.sun.  What
does this have to do with biz?

Tony Li - USC Computer Science Department
Internet: tli@usc.edu Uucp: usc!tli
Thus spake the master programmer: "A well written program is its own
heaven; a poorly-written program its own hell."

donp@mgaid1.niaid.nih.gov (Don Preuss) (01/19/90)

Yet another Yes vote. We have a large network here with many ciscos, and
would like a comp.dcom.cisco, as opposed to comp.dcom.brouters to discuss 
spcifics of cisco routers. This may be especially important now that 
cisco is changing their proceedures for customer support.

donp

--
donp@niaid.nih.gov