welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty) (01/20/90)
sorry for the delay in a response; i've been swamped by real life for the past week and have rather let the net slide by. anyway, some have suggested different top-level locations for the proposed history group; some are ok with me and some are not. my preferences, in order: soc.history (matches up with soc.politics, soc.culture, history as `social science') misc.history (this is really ok with me, if it's what people want) sci.history (this is almost reasonable, but stretching it a bit -- i don't think i'll call for it) talk.history (we really are hoping for a better group than the one implied by talk.* placement. i'd vote against this group myself.) i'll take an informal poll on soc.history vs. misc.history via email for the next week; whichever name wins is the one that i'll run a vote on. richard -- richard welty 518-387-6346, GE R&D, K1-5C39, Niskayuna, New York ..!crdgw1!lewis.crd.ge.com!welty welty@lewis.crd.ge.com ``air holes!? nobody said anything to me about air holes''