jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) (02/11/90)
In article <5697@blake.acs.washington.edu>, maddox@blake.acs.washington.edu (Tom Maddox) writes: > That wasn't sarcasm. Just a cruel commentary on your and Peter's > net grope. As to unwell . . . if I were engaging in erotic byplay with da > Silva, I'd look to my own health before diagnosing that of others. Uh, Tom? If you think making a play on the word "squirrel" is 'erotic', you need *major* help. -- Thank you for not coercing.
maddox@blake.acs.washington.edu (Tom Maddox) (02/12/90)
In article <3LO1TTxds8@ficc.uu.net> jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff "nuts about Peter's buns" daiell) writes: >Uh, Tom? If you think making a play on the word "squirrel" is 'erotic' If that were the case, I would indeed need help. But I was referring to two squirrels making kissy-face over the net (especially odd, since you apparently work right next to one another, but I guess the need for a truly public circle-jerk overcame your discretion). Just remember, though, that Peter has a wife who may or may not take kindly to this sort of global display. Then again, maybe it was the da Silva poster forger who had the wife; so forget it: you two go right ahead and make whatever public displays of affection you find necessary. Besides, Trish was right: I shouldn't let my weak stomach keep you from expressing your love.