[news.groups] FINAL CALL FOR VOTES - rec.humor.objectivism

hans@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Hans Huttel) (02/23/90)

This is the _last_ CALL FOR VOTES for the rec.humor.objectivism
newsgroup, which is to be unmoderated.

If you are in favour of this group and charter (as defined below),
send me mail with the single line of text:

YES for rec.humor.objectivism as proposed.

If you are opposed to the existence of this group with this charter,
send me mail with the single line of text:

NO for rec.humor.objectivism as proposed.

I receive mail addressed to hans@lfcs.ed.ac.uk

(see also my .signature file)

The vote will run for 21 days.  Votes received after March 1, 90 will not
be counted. The result will be posted to news.groups,
news.announce.newsgroups and rec.humor on March 2, 90.

====================================================================

1.  The Name--RHO

Rec--because of the approach participants should use when contributing
to this newsgroup.  What is recreational about it is that postings
should be Objectivist-style parodies, i.e. stuff that pretends to be
serious reasoning based on observations of reality.  "Ayn Rand says
so", "My parents always told me that...", and "I have a headache" are
good examples that can be used as premises for a `conclusion'.

Humor--because humour, at the base of all other rec.humor.*
newsgroups, will be the content.  All kinds of jokes will be discussed.

Objectivism--because most participants will be people who have already
grasped the fact that Ayn Rand has identified a set of fundamental
principles that integrate to make a special approach to humour.
Contributors should have actually read an Objectivist article from
another newsgroup before making any lengthy comments on a topic, since
this will improve the quality of the humour dramatically.  Posters who
question Ayn Rand's conclusions are NOT excluded, since the mere act
of questioning means that you actually cannot treat this stuff
seriously.  Irrational, tongue-in-cheek opponents making broad
generalizations or asking what seem to be specific questions are
especially welcome.

2.  Charter

rec.humor.objectivism	for those who grasp that Objectivists
	are funny and are interested in poking fun at Ayn Rand's
	Objectivism.  The primary content is intended to be
	pseudo-analyses of philosophic principles (and their
	applications) based on Objectivist postings.

This current posting (in total) comprises a longer explanation of the
charter.  Note that the word "primarily" allows the contributions of
ANY kind as long as they are interesting to people writing Objectivist
humour. It also allows the derivative use of Objectivist postings from
other newsgroups by not too serious folks who are not that interested
in it but may want to laugh at Objectivism from time to time.

3.  Quality

Several things will help RHO achieve the quality its founder desires.

a)  The precise wording of the charter above should be used in your
evening prayers.

b)  This notice will be posted once (NOW).

c)  Guidelines that people with a sense of humour should follow to
contribute with truly irrational posters will be posted every now and
then. 

d)  Style guidelines that _I_ dream up will be posted whenever I've
got nothing better to do. 

e)  Guidelines for expressing disagreement should not be necessary,
since everybody I know agrees that Objectivism is funny.

f)  The only action needed by system administrators should be to
prevent the only way someone can initiate (indirect) force; i.e.,
they need to remove USENET privileges of those who fraudently
associate their words with the signatures of others.

DISCLAIMER:  the intent of this group is not to represent Objectivism
but to provide a forum for showing people how funny it is.

HH  March 8, 90

| Hans H\"{u}ttel, Office 1603     JANET: hans@uk.ac.ed.lfcs
| LFCS, Dept. of Computer Science  UUCP:  ..!mcvax!ukc!lfcs!hans
| University of Edinburgh          ARPA:  hans%lfcs.ed.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk
| Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, SCOTLAND ...  Ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more!