jeffd@ficc.uu.net (Jeff Daiell) (03/01/90)
In article <P0+1OSCxds31@ficc.uu.net>, spenser@ficc.uu.net (Spenser Aden) writes: > About this fish.frenzy - > > > But why not this: rmgroup sci.aquaria and rec.aquaria, and recall for votes > without discussion (I think that breaking the rule is ok this time, since > plenty of discussion has gone on). So what if the sci vote was fraud - it won't > pass this time if it really made a difference. And so what if the rec vote was > valid before - it'll pass again if so. > > If you choose to flame me, fine. I wasn't around when the initial barfing > over this occurred, but the rehash is enough for me. Just recall for votes > and see again. > Flame you? When you've taken the same position I've been advocating? Nope. Let me just add an "Amen!" to your posting; a head-to-head vote taken by an impartial person is an excellent idea. Jeff Daiell -- "Will you still love me tomorrow?" -- The Shirelles